Idk but give me brainliest it will give you points back
Answer:
a) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean attendance is greater than 642.
Step-by-step explanation:
since in the question it is mentioned that the average attendance at games should be more 642 and according to this he moving the team with a larger stadium. Also the hypothesis conducted and the conclusion would be failure to deny the null hypothesis
So here the conclusion that should be made in non-technical term is that there should be no enough proof in order to support the claim that the mean attendence is more than $642
Answer:
2 to the power of one sixth
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming you don't already know this, any type of root can be expressed as an exponent. Generally speaking:
![\sqrt[n]{x} = {x}^{ \frac{1}{n} }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Csqrt%5Bn%5D%7Bx%7D%20%20%3D%20%20%7Bx%7D%5E%7B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%20%7D%20)
So you can rewrite the given fraction as

and then reduce as you normally would. That is, if the bases of the numerator and denominator are the same, then you can subtract the denominator's exponent from the numerator's exponent like so:

Since

the answer is
![{2}^{ \frac{1}{6} } \: or \: \sqrt[6]{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%7B2%7D%5E%7B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B6%7D%20%7D%20%20%5C%3A%20or%20%5C%3A%20%20%5Csqrt%5B6%5D%7B2%7D%20)
B is your answer if you need me to explain why just ask me :) have a good day
Answer:
81
Step-by-step explanation:
i added it all