The push factor is the second answer. Pull factor would be the opposite
These explanations "make people feel safer and the
world more comprehensible".
The just-world hypothesis otherwise
called just world fallacy is the cognitive inclination or supposition that a
man's activities are innately disposed to convey ethically reasonable and
fitting results to that individual, to the finish of every honorable activity
being in the end compensated and every insidious activity inevitably rebuffed.
Answer it is an example or oral tradition because it can be passed down from generation to generation by word of mouth.
Explanation:
When the price increased<span> two things happened: (1) plywood was rationed </span>to<span> its most important uses (not doghouses or decks), and (2) the high </span>prices<span> were an incentive for more plywood </span>to <span>be ... As we </span>can<span> see on the demand graph, there is an inverse relationship between </span>price<span> and </span>quantity <span>demanded.</span>
This argument is based on "the linguistic relativity hypothesis".
The hypothesis of linguistic relativity holds that the structure of a dialect influences its speakers' reality view or discernment. Prevalently known as the Sapir– Whorf theory, or Whorfianism, the standard is regularly characterized to incorporate two forms. The solid form says that dialect decides thought and that etymological classifications confine and decide intellectual classifications, while the feeble adaptation says that phonetic classifications and use just impact thought and choices.
