Answer:
Strong positive
Explanation:
In studies, we usually establish relationships between two or more variables using correlations. Correlations tell us how this variables are related.
- Two variables have a positive correlation when if one increases the other increases too.
- Two variables have a negative correlation when if one increases the other decreases and vice versa.
Also, a correlation can be weak, moderate or strong. Researchers agree that a correlation that is larger than 0.70 should be considered a strong correlation.
In this example Isabella reads about a study saying there's a correlation coefficient of +0.85 between hours spent studying and final exam grade. <u>The fact that the sign of this correlation is "+" tells us that it is positive</u> (the more hours spent studying, the better final exam grade). We can also see that <u>the coefficient is 0.85 which is greater than 0.70 and therefore we can consider this correlation as a strong one.</u>
Thus, Isabella would conclude that this is a strong positive relationship.
Answer:
1. It involves risk. In crop rotation, investing in a season involves input of much money to buy different seedlings of the different types of crops to be planted.
2. Improper implementation can cause much more harm than good.
3. Obligatory crop diversification.
Answer:
to create laws to protect the rights of colonists
The experiments are:
- The gravitational lensing that experiments use to light around the dark matter such as black hole which makes the light bent.
- The gravity probe B that <span>makes the axes of gyroscopes inside to drift slightly over a period o time, a result that some how relevant to einstein theory
- </span>the Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO<span>) that found piece of evidences for black hole colission</span>
Answer:
Culrural relativism
Explanation:
This idea was first originated in the anthropological research by Franz Boas in the first few decades of the 20th century and later popularized by his students.
It suggests that a person's behaviour cannot rightly be evaluated by a culture outside of his own. In other words, to understand ones behaviour, it should be analyzed paying attention to his culture.