1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Citrus2011 [14]
3 years ago
5

What is the difference between a naturalized citizen and a natural-born citizen?

Law
2 answers:
zavuch27 [327]3 years ago
6 0

<u><em>Answer:</em></u>

<em>A naturalized citizen is someone who has lawfully lived in the United States for at least five years and has become a U.S. citizen through a formal immigration application process called Naturalization. ... However, natural-born citizens may apply for federal jobs requiring citizenship.</em>

<em />

<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>

<em>*Hope this helped*</em>

<u><em /></u>

Lunna [17]3 years ago
4 0
A naturalized citizen is the legal process of a non citizen acquiring a citizenship of that country. a natural born citizen is an individual who is born in the country.
You might be interested in
Al-Qaida can be used as an example of new terrorism T/F
Archy [21]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

It's a modern day terrorism.

3 0
2 years ago
Hsjdhdvdjdudhdbdbdbdudhdhrjevehd
emmasim [6.3K]
You are absolutely right i agree
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the effectiveness of delegated legislation
Goryan [66]

Answer:

Hope this helps

Explanation:

(iii) Delegated legislation is more flexible than an Act of Parliament. It can be passed quickly and easily amended or revoked, so that the law is up to date. Therefore, it allows rapid change. (iv) Delegated legislation helps in removing the difficulty clause and meet unforeseen emergencies expeditiously.

7 0
3 years ago
A few years ago, Bill became a victim of identity theft. Recently, Bill received a corrected credit clearance from Indent Credit
slavikrds [6]

Answer:

Fair Credit Reporting Act

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Martina is arrested for a crime and refuses to take the witness stand at his or her trial.
Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

In Griffin v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination not only allows a criminal defendant to refuse to take the witness stand during his trial, but it also bars the prosecutor from urging the jury to interpret that silence as an indication that the defendant has something to hide. The Court reasons that the right against self-incrimination would be meaningless if a defendant’s exercise of the right could be used against him.

Hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The United States Constitution and _____________________________________ establish the fundamental principles and rules by which
    9·1 answer
  • What was the main goal of early American city police?
    5·1 answer
  • (LC)During what portion of the trial is most of the evidence presented?
    9·2 answers
  • Law is a practical discipline; theory has no place in law. With specific references to the Law of Contract, discuss.
    8·1 answer
  • What is true about conflicts of interest?
    11·1 answer
  • 2. What are the bits of pigment found in the cortex of a hair is called and why are they dark?​
    14·1 answer
  • Which Article in the Constitution establishes the Legislative Branch?
    7·1 answer
  • The power of the Supreme Court to hear a case that has already been tried and ruled on in lower courts is:
    6·1 answer
  • Which numbered pair of phrases best completes this diagram of the
    14·2 answers
  • Lanes of traffic on expressways flowing in different directions are divided by?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!