GOOD MORNING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
Supreme Court decision presiding that the Fourth Amendment's defense in contradiction of unreasonable explorations and appropriations must be prolonged to the states in addition to the federal government. This upturned Polka v Connecticut, asserting that defense from double jeopardy does relate in state courts.
Explanation: the court looked at the fourteenth amendment to make their decision and looks like they could`t decide
Answer:
because the Constitution does not address how state and local government share power
Answer:
asfatdsfgsdfrawfgdsgsdfgsdfgsrgfdsdfgsfdgsr
Explanation:
Answer: I would say A
Explanation:
Due to the simple fact that a hair simple contains DNA
Also, It couldn't be B because it is not a form of discipline
Where In the option of C it is not necessary for a conviction
Answer choice D; a hair sample is not going to lead to skeptical testimony because it is not testimonial evidence.
