Given inequality -3(4-6x) < x+5.
We have -3 in front of Parenthesis.
That represents multiplication of -3 and Parenthesis.
The multiplication of Parenthesis could be done by applying distributive property.
On distributing, we get
-12+18x < x+5
x is added on right side of the inequality. The reverse operation of addition is subtraction. So we need to subtract x from both sides, we get
-12+18x-x < x-x+5
-12+17x < 5
Now, we need to get rid -12 from left side.
So, we need to apply addition property of equality, we need to add 12 on both sides, we get
-12+12+18x < x+5+12
17x < 17
We need to get rid 17 from left side. So we need to apply division property of equality.
On dividing both sides by 17, we get
17x/17 < 17/17
x<1.
Answer:I onesly dont no
Sorry I have no friends
Step-by-step explanation:
Next time, please share your system of linear equations by typing only one equation per line:
<span>3x - 2y - 7 = 0 5x + y - 3 = 0 NO
</span><span>3x - 2y - 7 = 0
5x + y - 3 = 0 YES
Mult. the 2nd equation by 2 so as to obtain 2y, which will be cancelled out by - 2y in the first equation:
</span><span> 3x - 2y - 7 = 0
2(5x + y - 3 = 0)
Then:
3x - 2y - 7 = 0
10x +2y - 6 = 0
----------------------
13x - 13 = 0, so that x = 1. Find y by subbing 1 for x in either of the 2 given equations.</span>
Answer: It was marked down by 35%
Step-by-step explanation:
1. find the difference of the two prices, 68-44.20=23.8
Take the fraction 23.8/68 (because that is how much the price changed and you need to find what percent that is.
You get 35%
Answer:
Any negative number would be a counterexample.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since negative numbers get smaller as you multiply them by a larger number, this would prove this conjecture false.