Answer:
Take-back legislation
Explanation:
In the context of green marketing, take-back legislation provides strong incentives for redesigning products in ways that make it easier to reuse and recycle.
I hope it helps! Have a fantastic day!
Bored~
Answer:
The journal entry should be:
Dr Investment in Leghorn Corporation XX
Cr Accounts receivable XX
Explanation:
Foghorn Company must record the noncash payment as an asset which should be equal to the amount of money that it generally would have collected from the services provided. Since the payment is done through stocks, it must record that collection as an investing account.
Since transferring stocks usually takes a couple of days at least, the original journal entry should have recorded a debit to accounts receivable and a credit to service revenue.
Answer:
13%
Explanation:
As per the situation the solution of required rate of return first we need to find out the beta which is shown below:-
Expected rate of return = Risk-free rate of return + Beta × (Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return)
11% = 7% + Beta × 6%
Beta = 1
now If the market risk premium increased to 6% so,
The required rate of return = 7% + 1 × 6%
= 13%
Therefore for computing the required rate of return we simply applied the above formula.
Answer:
$20,000 Favorable
Explanation:
As for the provided information, we have:
Sales Volume Variance is defined as the variance arising due to difference in sales quantity based on standard price.
Formula for the above = (Actual Sales - Budgeted Sales) 
Standard Price
= (5,500 - 5,000) $40
= $20,000
This variance shall be categorized as favorable, as the actual sales quantity is more than the static budgeted quantity.
Therefore, Sales Volume Variance = $20,000 Favorable
Answer:
B. False
Explanation:
Since in the question, it is mentioned that Erney applied for a carpentry apprenticeship program. Also he took the test. This is not a illegal as if he wants to work in two specialized field than he could co but the work should be legal in nature and both the work are legal itself
Hence, the given statement is false
