The answer for this question would be choice C) or the third option.
The answer is C) because we can definitely cross out A) since it doesn't make sense if the police are misusing their power through justice, and its C) because as a police man, u swear to serve with truth and justice, and they are honoring their vow through this example.
The president 100 years ago was<span> woodrow </span>wilson
Answer:
generativity; stagnation
Explanation:
Generativity versus stagnation: In psychology, the term generativity vs. stagnation is one of the stages in the psychosocial development that was developed by Erik Erikson and is the seventh stage in the theory. The stage starts from the forty years of age in an individual's life and lasts through sixty-five years, this is considered to as the middle adulthood period.
Generativity: It refers to the process of making a mark by nurturing or creating things that will outlive an individual.
Stagnation: It refers to the process through which an individual redirects his or her energies into meaningful activities.
In the question above, Rob is probably facing the psychosocial conflict of generativity and is likely to develop stagnation.
Answer:
e. minimizes any potential differences between the control and experimental groups.
Explanation:
Random assignment -
It refers to the process during an experiment to make sure than all the participants are given equal opportunity , is referred to as random assignment .
It is also known as random placement .
The method is adapted in order to avoid any bias behavior during the experiment .
The method helps to ensure any difference between the groups , in the end of the experiment .
Hence , from the given question ,
The correct option is e.
Answer:
The answer is d. The contrast error.
Explanation:
The contrast error occurs when the qualities of a person are greatly exaggerated in comparison to previous performances. For example, if the first candidate in a job interview offers a particularily poor impression, it's likely that any improvement by a later candidate will be accepted by the interviewer. In other words, this phenomenon refers to "setting the bar too low" --or too high.
