Answer:
They warred with each other for primacy in their trade with the Europeans. Huron dominance of the Upper Great Lakes and eastern trade, and the Hurons themselves, were destroyed by the Iroquois in the mid-seventeenth century. The Sioux had been forced to move west by the Chippewa.
Answer:
Muslim forces ultimately expelled the European Christians who invaded the eastern Mediterranean repeatedly in the 12th and 13th centuries—and thwarted their effort to regain control of sacred Holy Land sites such as Jerusalem. Still, most histories of the Crusades offer a largely one-sided view, drawn originally from European medieval chronicles, then filtered through 18th and 19th-century Western scholars.
But how did Muslims at the time view the invasions? (Not always so contentiously, it turns out.) And what did they think of the European interlopers? (One common cliché: “unwashed barbarians.”) For a nuanced view of the medieval Muslim world, HISTORY talked with two prominent scholars: Paul M. Cobb, professor of Islamic History at the University of Pennsylvania, author of Race for Paradise: An Islamic History of the Crusades, and Suleiman A. Mourad, a professor of religion at Smith College and author of The Mosaic of Islam.
Answer:
No enforceable contract.
Explanation:
In this example, Steven and Marvin had already reached an agreement that was benefitial to Marvin. He was going to be able to drive across Steven's land. However, Steven later changed his mind. The fact that Marvin has no enforceable contract means that he will not be able to prove that Steven had given him this privilege. In turn, this means that he will not be able to force Steven to give him access again.
When an instructor listens carefully to your question in class, he or she is using acknowledgment.
The instructor is acknowledging that you are speaking and that you are interesting in knowing the answer to your question. He or she is not irritable, but rather patient with you and listens without interrupting you.
Answer:
Explanation:
The independence of the judiciary shall be guaranteed by the State and enshrined in the Constitution or the law of the country. ... This principle is without prejudice to judicial review or to mitigation or commutation by competent authorities of sentences imposed by the judiciary, in accordance with the law.
