Answer:
The primary difference between those two concepts is focus that each term has. The first one focus on the relationship between the level of production and the level of return. While the second one focus on the relationship between the level of production and the amount of factors used for that production.
Explanation:
One the one hand, the law of diminishing marginal returns is a concept known in the microeconomics theory due to the fact that it establishes the relationship between the productivity and the income for every aspect of it. Meaning that, when the productivity increases because of the increase of only one factor of production then the income will start to slowly decrease, confirming that when only one factor is increased the production will start to be incomplete and the return will decrease for that.
On the other hand, the law of diminishing marginal rate of technical substitution indicates the relationship between the level of output and the different factor used to produce. Meaning that, it shows how to keep the level of output the same while making changes in the amount of factors used.
Answer:
C. the price is below the equilibrium price
Explanation:
Remember, in the law of demand and supply the quantity supplied is dependent on the value of the price of a good.
In this case the price is below the equilibrium price; meaning demand would be higher than the supply which results in the shortage of the good and the company therefore raises the price of the good.
For example, the price of oranges decrease in the equilibrium price (from $10 to $5), resulting in an increase in the demand for oranges.
The increase in demand would lead to shortage, making farmers increase price wanting to supply more.
The inference illustrates that the true statement about comparative intelligence is that it compares a plantiffs fault with a defendant's and reduces the damage award proportionally.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
It should be noted that an inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced from the information given.
In this case, the inference illustrates that the true statement about comparative intelligence is that it compares a plantiffs fault with a defendant's and reduces the damage award proportionally.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
Answer:
$454,000
Explanation:
Ending inventory is the value of the inventory in the store at the end of the year.
Goods are purchased and added to the the beginning inventory, the sale for the period is deducted from it. the residual value is the value of ending Inventory.
In This question it is assumed that there is $26,000 of beginning inventory of the goods. $470,000 of the purchases were made and at the end of the year there was $42,000 balance of inventory.
We can calculate the deduction value as follow
Ending Inventory = Beginning Inventory + Purchases - deduction
$42000 = $26,000 + $470,000 - deduction
$42000 = $496,000 - deduction
Deduction = $496,000 - $42,000 = $454,000
The answers are the following:
a.
Brandon:
$7,000 + [($10,000/4)×3¿= $8,500
Ryan:
$7,000 + [($10,000/4)×1¿= $7,500
b.
Brandon $7,000
Ryan <span>$7,000</span>
