1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Masja [62]
3 years ago
5

10) What was the major impact of Plessy v. Ferguson upon American society? Question 10 options: This case made no impact upon Am

erican society. It mad
Social Studies
2 answers:
Alex17521 [72]3 years ago
6 0
Plessy V. Ferguson was only a landmark decision in the Supreme Court of the United States issued in 1896. The impact of Plessy v. Ferguson allowed the statement "Separate but equal" also known as segregation to become law in U.S. After this event, Jim Crow laws which were a system of laws meant to discriminate against African Americans, spread across the United States.
CaHeK987 [17]3 years ago
6 0

The answer is C)"It upheld segregation laws and made segregation the law of the land."


You might be interested in
I have a Serious Question if someone can answer it.
erica [24]
First question, yes. it is very possible
second question, I'm not too sure
6 0
3 years ago
a.one of the major problems with cohort studies is loss to follow-up. b.confounders are not a problem with cohort studies since
wlad13 [49]

Loss of follow-up is a problem in most cohort studies and often introduces bias. It is a situation in which a researcher loses contact with a subject, resulting in missing data. Too many subjects failing follow-up diminish the internal validity of the study.

<h3>What is follow-up loss in cohort studies? </h3>
  • Follow-up loss introduces bias (observed deviation of relevant measures from what would have been observed without bias) if there is a difference in the likelihood of loss due to follow-up  related to exposure status and outcome.
  • In the clinical research trials industry, loss due to follow-up is defined as patients who were actively participating in a clinical research trial at some point but who lost themselves (due to errors in the computer tracking system or due to unavailability).
  • In cohort studies: 1) Imaging outcome, is loss of follow-up. 2) These are essentially prospective studies, so confounding factors are not an issue. 3) These studies help examine multiple outcomes from a single, infrequent exposure. 4) These are usually faster and cheaper than case-control studies.
<h3>What are advantage and disadvantages of cohort studies?</h3>
  • In general, the main advantage of cohort studies is the ability to study multiple exposures and multiple endpoints in a single cohort. This recording allows you to select index groups, so you can explore rare recordings.
  • A major weakness of cohort studies is that this type of study design can be time consuming and expensive for results that are rare or evolve over long periods of time. It's a question of research.

To learn more about cohort study visit:

brainly.com/question/4562396

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
A word naming a particular person, place, or thing is a
Alex73 [517]
A word naming particular person, place or thing is a Noun
4 0
3 years ago
Ben and Summer enjoy roleplaying and engaging in mild sadistic and masochistic sexual interaction. Which statement is likely tru
dalvyx [7]

Answer:

D. The sadistic behavior would receive a diagnosis, but not the masochistic behavior.

Explanation:

According to the given question, Ben and Summer enjoy roleplaying and engaging in mild sadistic and masochistic sexual interaction. The statement that is likely true of Ben's and Summer's behavior is that the sadistic behavior would receive a diagnosis, but not the masochistic behavior.

This is because, sadism means receiving pleasure from another person's pain which can be require diagnosis while masochism may not.

3 0
3 years ago
According to jeremy siegel, since 1802, stocks outperformed bonds how often?.
satela [25.4K]

A study by Jeremy Siegal showed that since 1892, stocks have outperformed Bonds in 69% of rolling 5-year investing periods.

<h3>Do stocks outperform bonds?</h3>

According to Jeremy Siegel, they do. In fact, his research showed that since 1892, stocks have outperformed bonds 69% of the time during 5 year investment periods.

This makes sense because stocks have a higher return on bonds because they are riskier.

Find out more on stocks and bonds at brainly.com/question/20867391.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • On the day of Israel’s founding, neighboring Arab nations
    10·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP FAST! :) THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME ;)
    7·2 answers
  • 11. In 1787, delegates met in Philadelphia. They came from all of the 13 states except...
    14·2 answers
  • ________ occurs when a citizen votes for a candidate because he or she approves of the candidate's past record. a. retrospective
    9·1 answer
  • Why does life in the Sahara cluster around oases?
    7·1 answer
  • A repair for a fire is most likely paid by
    12·1 answer
  • How did Gandhi use noviolent resistance in the struggle for Indian independence?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these choices is an English rule that allows the public to cross low
    12·1 answer
  • The region that includes parts of Israel, Syria, and Lebanon is called __________.
    12·1 answer
  • Read a sentence from an argumentative essay.
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!