Answer: D
Explanation: because it makes sence.
Answer:
B. The composer's faith in the instrument and his knowledge of it played an important role in his success as a solo performer.
Explanation:
Option B is the correct answer. It is correct pronoun-antecedent agreement.
We all know that a pronoun is a word used instead of a noun. An antecedent is known to be a word which a pronoun stands for in a sentence.
For example, in the sentence above, the antecedent is the "composer" and the pronoun that refers to the antecedent is "his". We can see that the pronoun agrees with the antecedent. In pronoun-antecedent, the pronoun in the sentence must agree with its antecedent in number. This means that a singular pronoun must replace a singular noun while plural pronoun must replace a plural noun.
Answer:
The grammar is not correct. Replace is with are.
Explanation:
Identities are. Plural subject takes plural verb.
A gerund looks like a verb which ends in -ing, but it functions as a noun in a sentence. A predicate noun follows a linking verb, such as <em>to be, to seem, </em>etc. So, among all these examples, the only gerund phrase which is used as a predicate noun is found in the last sentence, and the gerund is leading, whereas the whole phrase is leading people to their seats.
The answer is slightly obvious. Obviously we know it’s not A. The Address does not talk about how citizens have the right to rebel, so it’s not B either. The Address is not taking a tone that reveals that war is pointless, and uses no negative terms to answer that claim. It’s not C either. Your answer is D, because the Address talks about how from those that have died, the remaining have increased devotion to their cause, and to resolve the conflict so that those who have died shall not die in vain.
