Answer:
Yes, if the person themselves are paying for it, it also depends on how picky you're being and who your complaining to.
Answer:
Answers B and C are correct (the middle two)
Explanation:
It <u><em>did </em></u>accelerate the growth of new territories, and it <u><em>was </em></u>financed by the government.
Hope this helps :)
(Brainliest?)
Answer:
when you kill them all ahahaha
Explanation:
ahahah
Answer:
The inference that is best supported by the passage is: A. Prior to the "Click it or Ticket" law, motorist could not be stopped simply for not waring a seatbelt."
Explanation:
In the passage is very clear that in the new law motorist can be now pulled over and ticketed for not wearing seatbelts (later in the passage it implies that's the reason why lawyers and citizens' gorups are protesting), which implies that before the state legislature passed the law this was not a reason to be pulled over even though this is not stated in the passage, the entire text circles around the novelty of pulling over motorist for not wearing seatbelt, therefore the best option is A especially because that is the main idea of the text.
