All categories

3 years ago

National law is

Social Studies

1 answer:

kenny6666 [7]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

B) Laws enacted by the U.S. Congress pertain to the United States.

Explanation:

In the United States, national law is the same as federal law. Federal laws are bills that have passed both houses of Congress, been signed by the president, passed over the president's veto, or allowed to become law without the president's signature. These laws make sure that all people are kept safe and they apply throughout the United States.

Considering this information we can conclude that the correct answer is B) Laws enacted by the U.S. Congress pertain to the United States.

I hope you find this information and useful! Good luck!

You might be interested in

Name the important places which glorify our country

fomenos

$\huge\purple{Hi!}$

The important places which glorify nepal are

Durbar Square
Shree Pashupatinath Temple
Bhoudanath Stupa
Changu Narayan Temple
Lumbini
Patan Durbar Square
Swayambhunath Stupa
Kathmandu Durbar Square
Janakpur
Muktinath Temple
Mustang Caves
Janaki Mandir
Kopan Monastery
Complex of Ruru Kshetra
Sagarmatha National Park

7 0

2 years ago

The Mexican culture has a tendency to accept large power distances. That is, in general, Mexicans believe that everyone has thei

Keith_Richards [23]

The correct answer is A) Bosses and subordinates each view the other as different types of people.

The Mexican culture has a tendency to accept large power distances. That is, in general, Mexicans believe that everyone has their place in an order of bosses and subordinates each view the other as different types of people.

Mexican workers have a peculiar way of thinking regarding the workplace and the bosses. Unfortunately for most Mexicans, they want to feel secure in a workplace with a salary and the certainty that their work is safe and they are going to keep it forever. And that is not the case anymore.

Mexican workers are not entrepreneurs who like to go and try something different, who wants to grow through meet different challenges in the workplace and having risks to overcome difficulties and aspire to new and better work positions.

They see their bosses so far away in the organizational hierarchy and do not have an interest -both, bosses and workers- to meet in the middle to try to establish a better relationship that helps the company to be more productive and the workers to grow and prosper.

5 0

3 years ago

Pls help! will give brainlist!

nikitadnepr [17]

Answer:

Russian oligarchs are business oligarchs of the former Soviet republics who rapidly accumulated wealth during the era of Russian privatization in the aftermath of the dissolution of the Soviet Union in the 1990s.

Explanation:

your welcome :D please mark brainliest

3 0

3 years ago

In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged to the laws of civil society, locke invokes the notion of

marissa [1.9K]

In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged

to the laws of civil society, Locke invokes the notion of "tacit consent." Rawls, who is also a "social contract theorist," of sorts, argues that a social contract can arise only from "hypothetical consent." What is the difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawls's notion of hypothetical consent?

a) Tacit consent requires actually expressing one's consent to the terms of the contract, whereas hypothetical consent simply requires that a citizen would have given consent under certain ideal conditions.

b) One who gives tacit consent implies consent to the terms of the contract through her actions, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent offers her explicit word on the basis of her particular desires.

c) One who gives tacit consent implicitly suggests, through her actions, that she accepts the terms of the contract, whereas to say that someone hypothetically consents means that she would have consented to the terms of the contract were she asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

d) Tacit consent is consent given in the state of nature, whereas hypothetical consent occurs within an ideal society.

e) Tacit consent is consent given by any rational agent, irrespective of her particular desires or ends, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent agrees to the terms of the contract based on some particular desire that she has.

Answer:

Explanation:

The major difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawl's notion of hypothetical consent is that unlike tacit consent, someone that hypothetically consents means that the person would have likely consented to the terms of the contract if she was asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

Tacit consent involves implicitly suggesting through actions that she accepts the terms of the contract.

5 0

3 years ago

politicians often have better relations with the media as candidates than they do after they are in office. explain why the rela

Gnesinka [82]

Candidates and politicians often cultivate and depend on the media to get their votes. Someone is going to tell you what you want to hear to get you to agree with them or believe in their cause.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers