1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Stells [14]
3 years ago
12

We can be misled if we rely on a single means of knowledge. True OR False

History
2 answers:
Nat2105 [25]3 years ago
8 0

The given statement is True.

We can be misled if we rely on a single means of knowledge.

Explanation:

When something is gained through theoretical as well as practical means, this is called as knowledge. Knowledge is the understanding of the following things:

  • facts
  • information
  • description
  • skills

The above knowledge is acquired through experience and learning.

If we rely on only one source or a single means of knowledge, then there are pretty much chances that we get mislead. So we have to rely on more than one means of knowledge. For example, if we want to gain knowledge about a subject, or a topic, then we must view many books, must use research work done before in that field, some practical experience of others, and also use internet to search for the related topic to get the knowledge. In this way, the chances of getting mislead are quite less.

Learn more about Knowledge at:

brainly.com/question/1255083

#LearnWithBrainly

ziro4ka [17]3 years ago
3 0

True.

We can be misled if we rely on a single means of knowledge.

You might be interested in
What impact did many state constitutions have on the separation of church and state affairs?. . . . A.Churches controlled more a
stellarik [79]

What impact did many state constitutions have on the separation of church and state affairs?

States could not support an established church.

7 0
3 years ago
What advanced ways if living had veen deleoped by the aztecs in mexico and the incas in peru?
poizon [28]

1. They built permanent houses

2. Organized governments

3. Held religious ceremonies

4. Had time for arts and crafts

6 0
3 years ago
in 1944, some high ranking government officials plotted to assassinate Hitler. Why did they plot to kill him? What was the plan?
Oliga [24]

Answer:

Roughly 200 German resisters participated in “Operation Valkyrie,” the failed July 20, 1944, plot to assassinate Adolf Hitler and overthrow the Nazi regime. To this day, historians debate what motivated these “men of July 20.” At least initially, Hitler’s authoritarianism, anti-Semitism and predilection for mass murder didn’t necessarily put them off. Yet as World War II rolled on, they came to share a belief that the Führer was disgracing Germany and leading it to ruin.

Hitler largely took power through the democratic process, but he quickly established a dictatorship in which dissent was not tolerated. Hundreds of thousands of perceived opponents found themselves imprisoned in concentration camps, while others were killed outright. Even the slightest provocation risked incurring Hitler’s wrath.

Given this hostile climate, most Germans who had voted against him kept a low profile, explains Peter Hoffmann, a history professor at McGill University who specializes in the German resistance movement during World War II.

Nonetheless, a small minority remained relatively uncowed. These dissidents, though never “a statistically relevant” percentage of the German population, actively “tried to bring down Hitler’s government,” Hoffmann says. To that end, they hatched more than 40 assassination plots.  

The best-known among these plots—and the one that arguably came closest to succeeding—occurred on July 20, 1944, when Claus von Stauffenberg (played by Tom Cruise in the movie Valkyrie) snuck a briefcase bomb into a meeting with the Führer.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the excerpt from President Grant's Inaugural Address. Pick one issue that Grant discusses in this passage. What challenges
ludmilkaskok [199]

Obama's purpose in this section of the

speech is to to inspire the American people to collectively work toward a better future, as explained below.

What is Purpose?

  • The intention or goal behind a speaker's speech is what we refer to as purpose. To put it another way, a speaker typically has a certain objective in mind, such as motivating or convincing the audience to take a certain action.

Regarding the past President

  • Obama's speech makes clear that his goal is to motivate people to collaborate for a brighter future.
  • In particular, the final statement of the section, "We are meant for this," reveals this purpose. Moment will present itself, and we will seize it—as long as we do it jointly.

To know more about Obama's visit:

brainly.com/question/27871532

#SPJ9

5 0
1 year ago
Although the 2008 election has been called the Facebook election, most campaign dollars were spent on which type of traditional
AnnZ [28]
The answer would be A

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What key rights were granted to english citizens in the english bill of rights?
    12·1 answer
  • Why was he woman from New Orleans reluctant to join the nawsa
    11·1 answer
  • How long did the Montgomery bus boycott last?
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a similarity between the Minoans and the Mycenaeans?
    7·1 answer
  • Which event inspired Timothy McVeigh to plan an attack on U.S. soil?
    8·1 answer
  • A majority of the early english migrants to the chesapeake bay area were
    15·1 answer
  • What is stated in the Resolution
    12·1 answer
  • Review the map. What is the absolute location of Sanaa?
    9·1 answer
  • Do presidential debates still matter?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the folowing was NOT true about South Vetnam?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!