Answer:
all good. tell me about your day
Answer:
(a) False;
(b) False;
(c) False;
(d) True.
Explanation:
(a) When equilibrium is reached, the forward reaction rate becomes equal to the reverse reaction rate, that's why the molarity of each species remains constant, but reactions don't stop.
(b) According to the principle of Le Chatelier, an increase in molarity of either reactants or products would lead to a disturbance of equilibrium. This disturbance would lead to the shift of equilibrium towards the side which would minimize such a disturbance.
(c) Equilibrium constant is only temperature-dependent, it's independent of molarity, pressure, volume etc. of any species present in the reaction.
(d) The greater the initial molarity of reactants, the more products can be formed, e. g., since the ratio of products to reactants should be kept constant, the larger the amount of reactants, the greater the amount of products formed to keep a constant ratio.
3. 4 g of a nonelectrolyte dissolved in 78. 3 g of water produces a solution. The molar mass of the solute will be 17.94.
<h3>
What is molar mass?</h3>
Molar mass of a substance is its mass in grams in per mole of a solution.
Freezing point: Freezing point of a substance is a temperature at which a liquid starts to solidify.
Depression in the freezing point can be calculated
[Depression in freezing point of pure solvent—Freezing point of solution] =[(0) - (-4.5)] °C =4.5 °C
molar mass = Number of moles of solute m / Mass of solvent in Kg
3.4g / M x 1/ 0.0783 kg = 43.42
Substitute AT by 4.5°C , Kr by 1.86 °C/m, and m by 43.42 m in equation (1) as follows:
1.86 x 43.42 / 4.5 = 17.94
Therefore, molar mass of solute to be 17.94.
To learn more about molar mass, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/22997914
#SPJ4
The outer electrons of an element are called the valence electrons. They help make an element stable.
Cesium : 1 valence electron<span>.
Magnesium : 2 valence electrons</span>
Answer:
false
true
true
Explanation:
false - changing the hypothesis to meet your needs is not a good researcher
true - when you can further analyze and explain then you have a successful experiment even if it's not what you expected
true - successful experiments do not end there. they can lead to more in depth questions.
