Answer:
Tax on a case of cola is $4 per case.
The burden that falls on consumers is $1 per case.
The burden that falls on producers is $3 per case
False. This is due to the fact that producers already carry a greater share of the tax burden.
Explanation:
Tax on a case of cola = Amount that consumers pay after the tax has been charged - Amount producers receive = $7 - $3 = $4 per case
Burden on consumers = Amount consumers pay after the tax has been levied - Amount consumers pay before tax was levied = $7 - $5 = $1 per case
Burden on producers = Tax on a case of cola - Burden on consumers = $4 - $1 = $3 per case
False. This is due to the fact that producers already carry a greater share of the tax burden.
<span>group that has unrealistic expectations and therefore the group with the lowest self-esteem on the confidence scale administered by Leslie</span>
Answer:
The correct option is the statement that reads " If a firm commits to making its environment a good place to work,workers will not leave"
Explanation:
The most qualified employees are always been poached because of the value they add to any organization,hence the first statement is absolute truth.
The second statement is wrong because there the best working environment cannot stop people from resigning,what in case someone needs to study masters abroad?
A certain level of turnover is healthy since it paves from for new hands with fresh perspective to be hired.
However, when turnovers becomes excessive,it implies a fundamental problem with the workplace.
Answer:
increase both aggregate supply and real output.
Explanation:
A rise in productivity makes it possible for each and every firm to rise the greater amount of output. due to this aggregate supply will rise which will lead to increase in the real output.
Also the rise in productivity increase the aggregate supply and the AS curve would be shifted to right that rise the real output but reduce the level of the price in the new equilibrium output level
Therefore the above represent the answer
The reason principled negotiation would be the most suitable strategy in international trade negotiation is because it helps a party to leverage his/her principles of the opponent to win the negotiation.
The principled type of negotiation is recognized as an interest-based class of negotiation.
- A principled negotiation is known as a winner-take-all style of negotiation that is focused on a specific goal of winning.
- In a principled type of negotiation, there are no space for consideration of other party’s needs and requirements.
- However, a principled negotiations is limited because it can fail to settle dispute or conflict even if a parties has the highest intentions and negotiating skills.
In conclusion, the reason principled negotiation would be the most suitable strategy in international trade negotiation is because it helps a party to leverage his/her principles of the opponent to win the negotiation.
Read more about principled negotiation
<em>brainly.com/question/6106694</em>
