Answer and Explanation:
A peaceful way to change any government would require everyone in the country and the government to agree on a set of standards that everyone can live with and be protected by.
A change in the government would have to have reasons based on major factors, as little factors wont be enough to change.
<u><em>#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em>I hope this helps!</em></u>
Answer:
Imagine that a scientist has created a new source of power that creates electricity for cars, trucks, factories, and homes is discussed below in details.
Explanation:
In terms of innovation, it is a new beginning of power, so it has creativity or a new idea. In the names of fluency, it is just an individual cause of power, so it does not have many facilities or many distinct ideas. In terms of versatility, it is a reservoir for various things such as automobiles, trucks, warehouses, and homes, so it has adaptability or adjusting ideas to many different circumstances. Finally, in terms of suitability, there is potential now, but we can always change it, so there is some suitability or an approach that solves the problem that was recognized.
Answer:
7th Grade, in Accelerated Program
Explanation:
A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
