They began to rely on production of crops (agriculture) rather than the hunting-and-gathering lifestyle. I hope I helped!
The answer is its own waste
Answer:
a). DOES
b). DOES NOT
Explanation:
A fallacy is the reasoning which is logically incorrect, it undermines the logical validity of the argument, and is also recognized as unsound. It is the use of the invalid reasoning or faulty reasoning in the construction of an argument.
In the context, it is given that every time the fire station's alarm rings, I understand that fire has broken out somewhere nearby. And if one needs to stop the risk of fire, then one should prohibit sounding the alarm of the fire station.
Thus this statement is the false reasoning and is logically incorrect. Sounding of the alarm does not causes the fire. So it does commit a fallacy and it does not commit an appeal to ignorance fallacy.
The appropriate response is a biopsychosocial model. The biopsychosocial model is an expansive view that ascribes infection result to the complicated, variable communication of natural elements, mental elements, and social elements.
I hope the answer will help you.
Answer: when your depret to get points cuz your account got delted
Explanation: On April 22, 1793, President George Washington issued a Neutrality Proclamation to define the policy of the United States in response to the spreading war in Europe. “The duty and interest of the United States require,” the Proclamation stated, “that they [the United States] should with sincerity and good faith adopt and pursue a conduct friendly and impartial toward the belligerent Powers.” The Proclamation warned Americans that the federal government would prosecute any violations of this policy by its citizens, and would not protect them should they be tried by a belligerent nation. This statement of policy triggered a fierce reaction from those who considered it a sellout of the nation’s revolutionary soul for the financial gain of the merchant class. “The cause of France is the cause of man, and neutrality is desertion,” one anonymous correspondent wrote the president. Critics believed that the Proclamation marked a dishonorable betrayal of our oldest and dearest ally and to a sacred alliance made in the darkest hours of the American Revolution. The Proclamation was important for the constitutional precedent it established in the exertion of executive authority in the realm of foreign policy, as well as for exciting partisan passions that were formative to the creation of political parties in the first party system.
Several important recent developments in both American and Europe led to Washington’s Neutrality Proclamation. The French Revolution turned more radical when it beheaded King Louis XVI in January 1793. Ten days later, revolutionary France, already fighting Austria and Prussia, declared war on England, Holland, and Spain, embroiling the entire European continent in conflict. Lastly, on April 8, 1793 the new French minister, Edmond Genet, arrived in Charleston, South Carolina. Genet was an instant hit with the American people who flocked in large numbers to greet the ebullient Frenchmen as he made his way north to the capital in Philadelphia. More ominous, however, was the fact that Genet, armed with commissions and letters of marque from his government, actively recruited Americans to fight for revolutionary France.
