Researcher wants to conduct a secondary analysis using a centers for disease control and prevention (cdc) database that was coll
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
Answer is explained in the explanation section below.
Explanation:
Note: This question is incomplete and lacks necessary data to solve for this question. However I have found similar question on the internet and I will be using that data. Besides, I have attached the data used in the attachment below.
Solution:
1. The debt-to-equity ratio is the best way to assess financial risk. A higher debt-to-equity ratio indicates a higher level of financial risk. This ratio represents the willingness of the equity of the owners to fulfil their obligations.
Formula used:
Debt-to-equity ratio = Total liabilities divided by owner's equity
For Clobes:
Total liabilities = 100,000
Owners' equity = 200,000
Debt-to-equity ratio = 100000/200000 = 0.5
For Snyder:
Total liabilities = 300,000
Owners' equity = 200,000
Debt-to-equity ratio = 300000/200000 = 1.5
For Welz:
Total liabilities = 300,000
Owners' equity = 100,000
Debt-to-equity ratio = 300000/100000 = 3
Welz faces the greatest financial risk because it has the highest debt-to-equity ratio. It has a debt-to-equity ratio of three. Even though it depends on the industry, a company's debt-to-equity ratio should be between 1 and 1.5 if it is considered optimal. In this case, Welz's financial risk is considerably higher.
2. calculate Return on Equity(ROE)
Formula used:
ROE = Net income / Owner's equity
For Clobes:
Net income = 25,000
Owners' equity = 200,000
ROE = 25,000 / 200000 = 0.125
For Snyder:
Net income = 30,000
Owners' equity = 200,000
ROE = 30000 / 200000 = 0.15
For Welz:
Net income = 20,000
Owners' equity = 200,000
ROE = 20000 / 100000 = 0.2
Welz has the highest return of equity (ROE) of 0.2.
As a result, Welz is the most profitable company.
3. Return on assets:
Formula used
Return on Assets = Net income / Total assets
For Clobes:
Net income = 25,000
Total assets = 300,000
Return on Assets = 25,000 / 300000 = 0.08
For Snyder:
Net income = 30,000
Total assets = 500000
Return on Assets = 30000 / 500000 = 0.06
For Welz:
Net income = 20,000
Total assets = 400,000
Return on Assets = 20000 / 400000 = 0.05
Hence,
Clobes has the highest return on assets, which is 0.08.
Answer:
Explanation:
Note: The table containing the data is attached as a file to this solution.
Also note that the values are given in percentages in the table, the decimal equivalents of those values are used in this calculation.
a)
i) Allele Frequency in the Inuit population
M allele frequency
= 0.835+(0.156/2) = 0.913
N allele frequency
= 0.009 + (0.156/2) = 0.087
ii) Allele frequency in Navojo Indian population
M allele frequency
= 0.845+0.072 = 0.917
N allele frequency
= 0.011+0.072 = 0.083
iii) Allele frequency In Finn population
M allele frequency
= 0.457+0.2155 = 0.6725
N allele frequency
= 0.112+0.2155 = 0.3275
iv)Allele frequency In Russian population
M allele frequency
= 0.399+0.22 = 0.619
N allele frequency
= 0.161+0.22 = 0.381
v) Allele frequency In Aborigines
M allele frequency
= 0.024+0.152 = 0.176
N allele frequency
= 0.672 + 0.152 = 0.824
b)
We can observe that the sum of the frequencies of M and N alleles in each of the populations above is 1. Therefore, all the populations are in Hardy Weinberg's equilibrium.
c)
It can be again observed that the M and N allele frequencies of the Finn and the Russian population are almost the same, then it is safe to say that the Finn and Russian population have had significant intermixing due to migration.
