Answer: c. They criticized or disparaged the IMF.
Explanation:
In the 2001 film, <em>Islam and America: Through the eyes of Imran Khan</em>, it is shown that the average person in Pakistan know what the IMF is and detests them. They criticized and disparaged the IMF with some reasons given being that;
- the IMF is a way for the Developed world to economically colonise Pakistan
- the IMF is tool for the Americans to use and try to assert control
- the IMF forces governments to raise utility prices to meet their conditions or pay back loans which makes poor people suffer the most.
Answer:
The correct answer is the second option: to monitor the progress of a multi-step project during its development.
Explanation:
To begin with, a <em>"Program Evaluation and Reviews Techniques"</em> or PERT as it name indicates it refers to an stadistic technique by which the companies can follow the process of certain projects that they are having currently. Moreover, its main purpose is to manage and analyze the steps that a project has in order to make them less susceptible to errors. In addition to that, its main factor to observe is the time during the steps of the project. Nowadays is very common to use a tool like this in major companies.
A type of production that focuses on making a large number of a few products rather than customer preferences is called mass production.
<h3>What is mass production?</h3>
Mass production is also referred to as continuous production or flow production and it can be defined as a type of production that focuses on manufacturing large quantities of a standardized product and it doesn't concern itself with customer preferences.
This ultimately implies that, mass production is mainly focused on making a large number of a few products rather than being focused on customer preferences. Also, the production is usually in a constant flow and automated by a mechanical process.
Read more on mass production here: brainly.com/question/744854
Answer: AGREE
Explanation:
A Monopoly faces no competition and are the only sellers of the product they sell. If firms in an industry successfully engage in collusion, the resultant effect will definitely be not unlike a Monopoly because they will set prices as a single firm, control output as a single firm and essentially run the market as a single firm.
They will sell at a rate where the Marginal Revenue curve will be below the demand curve. This will mean a higher price than a competitive market which was probably the main incentive for collusion.
A recent example would be the collusion between BMW, Daimler and Volkswagen, to hinder technological progress in improving the quality of vehicle emissions in order to reduce the cost of production and maximize profits. Thankfully this was busted by the European Commission in 2019.
