The three types of strategic alliances are Joint ventures, Equity Strategic alliances, and Non-Equity Strategic alliances. The advantages and disadvantages of strategic alliances are reduced costs & risks and potential competitors respectively.
There are three types of strategic alliances. A joint venture is a corporation that was created by two parent companies. It is kept up by distributing assets and equity according to a legal contract.
When one corporation buys shares in another company, a strategic equity partnership results. An agreement to share resources without forming a separate firm or allocating equity is called a non-equity strategic partnership.
Partners may grow up quickly, create cutting-edge customer solutions, break into new markets, and pool important resources and experience through strategic alliances. And this is a game-changer in a business environment that prizes speed and creativity.
Its drawbacks include a lack of managerial engagement or equity interest, apprehension about market insulation because a local partner is present, ineffective communication, and inefficient resource allocation.
To learn more about strategic alliances refer to:
brainly.com/question/17250330
#SPJ4
Answer:
I believe its Transfer Payments (or government transfer)
Explanation:
A transfer payment is a redistribution of income and wealth by means of the government making a payment, without goods or services being received in return.
Answer: See Explanation
Explanation:
The payback period for both projects would be calculated as:
Alpha Project
Cost = $530,000
Annual net cash flow = $60,000
Payback period = Cash / Annual net cash flow
= $530,000 / $60,000
= 8.83
Beta Project
Cost = $170,000
Annual net cash flow = $18,000
Payback period = Cash / Annual net cash flow
= $170,000 / $18,000
= 9.4
We can see that Alpha Project is better as the payback period is lesser than Beta project
