All categories

3 years ago

It is illegal to yell out fire in a crowded movie theater fact or opinon

2 answers:

7 0

This is a very debatable question, therefore, it is an opinion. Despite the fact that the picture frequently speaks to unlawful discourse of yelling ' flame' in a swarmed theater alludes to an obsolete lawful standard. At a certain point, the law criminalized such discourse, which made an "unmistakable and current hazard." It should specifically urge others to carry out particular criminal activities they could call their own. The thought of dishonestly yelling "flame" in a swarmed theater emerged from the Preeminent Court's 1919 choice for the situation of Schenck v. United States. The Court decided consistently that the First Alteration, however it ensures flexibility of expression, does not secure perilous discourse. The case being referred to did not include flames, theaters or being frenzy. This is my own opinion.

anyanavicka [17]3 years ago

6 0

"It is illegal to just yell fire in a swarmed or crowded movie theater;" is an opinion and not a fact.

<h2>Further Explanation</h2>

Responses to the question---that whether or not it is a fact or opinion, has always proven to be an opinion, Holmes' opinion.

In 1919, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., stated in his opinion that it is wrong to ''falsely shout fire in a theater to cause a panic''.

The statement was used to figuratively represent the actions or speeches made for creating panic and carrying out criminal activities; it does not mean someone shouting fire in a crowded theater in the literal sense.

Therefore, in that sense, speeches and actions made to carry out criminal activities by anyone were and are still unlawful since it's in a position to urge others to carry out certain criminal activities.

The law, then, criminalized yelling fire in a crowded or swarmed theater, because such proved 'an obvious and present danger. “Dishonestly yelling "fire" in a swarmed theater, therefore, emerged during the Preeminent Court's 1919 decision for the situation of Schenck v. the United States.

The Court overruled that the First Alteration, is not in any way “a perilous discourse” no matter how flexible the expression is.

LEARN MORE:

shouting “FIRE!” in a crowded movie theater brainly.com/question/8157898
freedom of speech is protected by the Bill of Rights brainly.com/question/8397039

KEYWORDS:

illegal
fire
crowded
movie theater
fact
opinion

You might be interested in

In Part A of this activity, you will complete a table with details that show how the historical and cultural setting influences

Serggg [28]

Answer:

Characterization The setting influences what the characters need. The soldiers are hungry because the setting is a difficult place to find food.

Plot The setting influences how the story’s rising action develops. The soldiers stop at the ranch to demand food and discover that they are in the “famous Demetrio Macias' country” where they learn that the man living at the ranch is Demetrio Macias.

Theme The setting influences how the theme is introduced. The placement of soldiers on the sierra introduces a theme related to war or battle.

Explanation:

This is the sample answer.

4 0

3 years ago

Revising involves a. Checking for spelling errors b. Checking for punctuation errors c. Checking for content clarity and coheren

ollegr [7]

I've always been taught that revising involves checking for spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Basically any kind of improvements. Is this one of those questions where you check all that apply? Revising also includes making sure you have stayed on topic and gives you the chance to remove things that may not really apply or add other things that may have been left out. It's where the writer truly polishes everything up.
I hope this helps.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Describe a new character you would add to your favorite book, television show, or movie. What does your character look like?

sweet-ann [11.9K]

Answer:

When you think of Marcie, you think of intricate constellations and ablaze stars. She was beyond the mere standard of being beautiful, she was ethereal- she was out of this world. Her sleek, black hair was like a well-woven net of silk ribbons; it captured the attention of everyone around her and captivated them for all the right reasons. Her beady, slanted eyes were worth a million buck, for they held so much passion and devotion that ignited her existence with glee. When her hands stroked the gleaming strings of her harp, she momentarily took off to her own world- somewhere more celestial, more familiar to her. Her graceful aura was endearing; everyone who knew her, respected her and looked up to her. Marcie was the epitome of elegance and eloquence, but she was also a conflicted enigma.

5 0

3 years ago

What are the "benefits of failure" according to Rowling? Why do you think she discusses these?

notka56 [123]

Answer:

According to Rowling, Failures:

Give an inner security that had never attained by passing examinations. Teach things about ourselves that could have learned no other way.

Let us discover weI had a strong will, and more discipline than had suspected

She discusses these based on her own experiences.

5 0

3 years ago

What argument does the author anticipate and refute in this excerpt from the Declaration of Independence?

zaharov [31]

The declaration of independence written by Stephen Lucas portrayed the colonists as victims of the drama. He stated also the separation of the Americans and the English people. In these lines given, the answer to this problem is A describing the Americans as the colonists and the British people as the colonies.

6 0

4 years ago