1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ray Of Light [21]
3 years ago
9

Which agreement solved the disagreement over whether slaves should be counted for the purposes of representation?

History
1 answer:
lapo4ka [179]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

<em>The Three-Fifths Compromise</em><em> is an agreement solved the disagreement over whether slaves should be counted for the purposes of representation</em>

Explanation:

This compromise was between northern and southern states.The South wanted slaves to be counted as whole, people so that they could have higher population numbers which would result in more representatives in the House.

The North, however, did not want them to have more representation and argued that if they are going to treat the slaves as though they were livestock, then they should count for the same towards population - which is none.

You might be interested in
After the death of king solomon, jerusalem became the capital of the southern kingdom of
steposvetlana [31]
The answer is southern kingdom of Judah
4 0
3 years ago
War of the west lesson 2
Naddik [55]
What is your question this isnt a question
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who established the Democratic Party?​
Alexeev081 [22]

Answer:

Andrew Jackson

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was Washington against the formation of political parties and participation in political parties?
Advocard [28]

George Washington was against the formation of and participation in political parties because he truly believed in Unity.

From his perspective Unity, and not Division, was the key for a democratic republic to survive. He really thought that political parties would have negative effects because they would divide and destroy the United States.  

And that's the main reason why throughout his political life until his death, he was sure political parties were not needed because the country could and should function without them.  

7 0
3 years ago
How did the atomic bomb and Korea influence the post-World War II world?
leva [86]
The release of two atomic bombs on Japan in August 1945 helped end World War II but ushered in the Cold War, a conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union that dragged on nearly half a century.

In the United States, the use of the bombs was widely praised by a public tired of war and high casualties. America heaved a huge sigh of relief that the blasts ended the need to shift hundreds of thousands of troops who had survived Europe to fight yet another bloody war on Japanese soil.\

Hope This Helps;)

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why was Susan B. Anthony so significant during the Progressive Era?
    7·1 answer
  • What event led to the United States bombing Afghanistan on October 7, 2001?
    12·2 answers
  • During the early colonial period, many differences began to develop between the northern and southern regions of the English col
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement best explains why American tastes found it difficult to appreciate Horatio Greenough's sculpture George Washingt
    14·2 answers
  • What hardships did Miner faced?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the US join Afghan tribes to fight Taliban?
    7·1 answer
  • In order to stop the newspapers from printing negative comments about him, President Adams
    9·2 answers
  • What was it like living during World War 1 for Germans ?
    13·1 answer
  • The passage says that the partition of Korea
    8·2 answers
  • Help me please? brainliest if correct (30 points) im timed
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!