The researcher's scientific/alternative hypothesis is:
- Different sources of caffeine leads to differences in women's attentional control performance.
The researcher's null hypothesis is:
- Different sources of caffeine leads to no difference in women's attentional control performance.
The type of sample which the researcher is using is:
A disadvantage to using this sample type is:
The thing which the researcher can conclude about these data is:
- It is conclusive based on the reaction of the women to the independent variables.
If, in the population, women actually show NO difference in attentional control performance after drinking black tea versus coffee, the type of statistical error which the researcher has made is:
<h3>What is a Scientific Hypothesis?</h3>
This refers to the difference between two variables which is discovered during a scientific research and is an observed pattern.
Read more about scientific hypothesis here:
brainly.com/question/896413
Answer:
hey46
Step-by-step explanation:
46
Answer:
You can see below!
Step-by-step explanation:
Basically, a protractor is used to measure angles. You probably have a semi-circle shaped one. Looking at the bottom middle of the protractor should show you lines intersecting each other at a point. If you have an angle on a piece of paper, place that point on the ends of the line segments making up the angle. Then, check where each line of the angle crosses the numbers on the outer rim. That shows you the measure of the angle you are examining. It can be a bit tricky, but with practice you'll get it in no time!
Answer:
V = 3591.4 ft³
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula for the volume of a sphere whose radius is given is
V = (4/3)πr³
Here we have V = (4/3)(3.14)(9.5 ft)³, or:
V = 3591.4 ft³
u - v = <5, 2> - <2, - 3> = <5 - 2, 2 + 3> = <3, 5>
given a vector <u, v> then the magnitude is √ (u² + v² ) and it's angle of direction is
θ = 
(
)
thus the magnitude of <3, 5> = √(3² + 5²) = √34 ≈ 5.83 ( to 2 dec. places )
Θ = (
) = 59.04° ( to 2 dec. places )
