1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pogonyaev
3 years ago
15

Why are common names not a good reference to a species? common names can be in different languages common names vary with locati

on common names vary with culture common names vary with species color
Biology
1 answer:
zalisa [80]3 years ago
4 0
<span>When you talk about species in a scientific context, you would want to make sure that you are not misunderstood. Therefore, it is good to use names that are the same everywhere: and using Latin names is the convention, this way people from other countries will understand you too! So the problem is that common names are different in different languages (=correct answer). (Actually this also makes them differ in different locations and cultures, but it's secondary to language)</span>
You might be interested in
A scientist discovers a fossil of an animal and places it in the fossil record. The organism’s bones are similar to the bones of
aksik [14]

Answer: A. The fossils cam from the same organism

Hope this helps!

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which step is a protein formed during gene expression?
Finger [1]
D. DNA replication

DNA always forms proteins
7 0
3 years ago
Help please due tomorrow!!
valentina_108 [34]

Answer:

Y- x+ Y-

Explanation:

when an atom loses electrons the atom the result is a positive ion. when an atom gains an electron, the result is a negative ion

7 0
3 years ago
Could someone help me with these fast
azamat
The tennis ball. Because of less mass
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Consider a hypothetical food chain consisting of grass, rabbits, and foxes. The primary productivity of the grass is 200 units.
STALIN [3.7K]

The maximum amount of energy that we should expect to be recycled from fox trophic level back to the grass trophic level is 0 units.

A food chain describes who eats whom in the wild. Every living thing – from unicellular algae to giant blue whales – needs food to survive. Every food chain is a possible pathway that energy and nutrients can travel through an ecosystem. The primary productivity of the grass is 200 units. There is a 10 fold decrease in the amount of energy units as we move upwards in production chain. So from grass to rabbits we lose energy. The foxes will only really have two units once it's decreased by 10 fold again. The grass does not get any energy from the decaying bodies of foxes, they get the minerals that they need to grow.  And so the correct answer to this question is 0 units because when the energy gets recycled from fox trophic level back to the grass trophic level it will be totally reduced.

Note: The question seems to be incomplete. So the complete question is "Consider a hypothetical food chain consisting of grass, rabbits, and foxes. The primary productivity of the grass is 200 units. What is the maximum amount of energy that we should expect to be recycled from the fox trophic level back to the grass trophic level? Answer choices: A) 0 units B) 0.2 units C) 2 units D) 20 units"

Learn more about food chain on:

brainly.com/question/16065961

#SPJ4

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the power of 2 to power of 3 =
    13·2 answers
  • A 55 kg person on Earth has the __________mass on the moon.
    15·1 answer
  • What is the strongest and the weekest part of a magnet
    6·1 answer
  • Need help with this pls ❤️
    6·2 answers
  • Which of these choices is the main purpose of human culture?
    10·2 answers
  • Explain why natural selection cannot occur in a population that has no variation in traits.
    5·1 answer
  • To avoid such dangerous results, it is important to give a patient compatible blood. Which type of blood can a person with Type
    15·2 answers
  • Which organelle makes the proteins that are needed by the cell?
    13·2 answers
  • When Charles Darwin published his radical theory of evolution by natural selection in 1859 it was attacked by many early biologi
    12·1 answer
  • 5. Viruses are not cells, nor are they made of cells. They also cannot
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!