Answer:
lies between 0 and 1.
Step-by-step explanation:
We must have in mind that given average weight of a newborn panda is a non-integer rational number, such that lies between two integer rational number. In other words, this number must satisfy the following condition:
, 
Which is now developed mathematically to deduce a useful expression to find integers:
1) Given
2) 
Modulative property
3) 
Existence of Multiplicative inverse/Definition of division.
4) ![(n\cdot b)\cdot b^{-1} < a\cdot b^{-1}< [(n+1)\cdot b] \cdot b^{-1}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%28n%5Ccdot%20b%29%5Ccdot%20b%5E%7B-1%7D%20%3C%20a%5Ccdot%20b%5E%7B-1%7D%3C%20%5B%28n%2B1%29%5Ccdot%20b%5D%20%5Ccdot%20b%5E%7B-1%7D)
Commutative, Associative and Distributive properties.
5) 
Compatibility with Multiplication/Existence of Multiplicative Inverse/Modulative Property/Result.
If we know that 
and 
, the following inequation is formed:
It is quite evident to conclude that lies between 0 and 1.
Well what exactly do you need help with?
Answer:
The correct answer is B
Step-by-step explanation:
First, the question said that the shoes were $15 less than double the price of his pants. In algebra 2p would mean 2 multiplied by p so we know that C and D are wrong. Now $15 less than 2p would mean you have to subtract by 15, so now we have 2p-15. Since we haven't added in the amount of money the pair of pants cost, we have to use addition to add it in, and that adds to the equation making the equation 2p - 15 + p. So, the answer is B.
What's 200 minus 50 that's your answer simple
