Answer: Please refer to Explanation
Explanation:
The Dominant Strategy in a game is the strategy that a player will choose that will provide them with the highest payoff regardless of what the other player does.
In the above, the dominant strategy will be for RAPHAEL to choose LEFT.
By choosing left Raphael makes a payoff of 4 if Susan picks Left as well and a Payoff of 6 if Sudan picks Right. This is better than him picking Right and he will get a Payoff of 3 if Susan chooses Right as well.
The Nash Equilibrium is the strategy where both are making the best that they can given the strategy of the other player and deviating from it will give them less pay out.
The dominant strategy therefore is for RAPHAEL to choose LEFT and for SUSAN to choose RIGHT.
This is because Raphael will pick Left as it maximises their payoff and Susan will then pick a strategy that gives her the highest payoff based on Raphael's decision which is to go RIGHT.
The Chester company is likely implementing a strategy called
the niche differentiation. This is the process in which helps a specific
organization or company to coexist by having to use their environment in a
different way in when they are to compete.
Answer:
Present value = $21,804 (approx)
Explanation:
Given:
Periodic payment = $3,200
Number of period = 12
Interest rate = 10% = 10/100 = 0.1
Present value = ?
Computation of Present value:
![Present\ value = PMT[\frac{1-(1+r)^{-n}}{r} ]\\\\Present\ value = 3,200[\frac{1-(1+0.1)^{-12}}{0.1} ]\\\\Present\ value = 3,200[\frac{1-(1.1)^{-12}}{0.1} ]\\\\Present\ value = 3,200[\frac{1-0.318630818}{0.1} ]\\\\Present\ value = 3,200[\frac{0.681369182}{0.1} ]\\\\Present\ value = 21,803.6188](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Present%5C%20value%20%3D%20PMT%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281%2Br%29%5E%7B-n%7D%7D%7Br%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%203%2C200%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281%2B0.1%29%5E%7B-12%7D%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%203%2C200%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-%281.1%29%5E%7B-12%7D%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%203%2C200%5B%5Cfrac%7B1-0.318630818%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%203%2C200%5B%5Cfrac%7B0.681369182%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%5C%5C%5C%5CPresent%5C%20value%20%3D%2021%2C803.6188)
Present value = $21,804 (approx)
Answer:
C. A country can specialize in producing that for which it has a comparative advantage and then trade for other needed goods and services.
Explanation:
<em>Comparative advantage</em> is simply evaluating the opportunity cost of other benefits or costs, if the country is opting to choose for a specific category of goods for production purposes.
For example, let's say US can produce 20 Television (TV) sets and 50 Air Conditioners in a month. Here, the opportunity cost of producing 1 TV set is 50/20 i.e. 2.5 Air Conditioners. Similarly, the opportunity cost of producing 1 Air Conditioner (AC) is 20/50 i.e. 0.4 TV set. Hence, US should produce Air Conditioners over TV sets as per <em>Comparative Advantage</em> concept.
Take another example, let's say UK can produce 50 Television (TV) sets and 20 Air Conditioners in a month. Hence, the opportunity cost of producing 1 TV set is 20/50 i.e. 0.4 Air Conditioner. On the other hand, the opportunity cost of producing 1 AC is 50/20 i.e. 2.5 TV sets. Thus, UK should produce TV sets over AC's as per <em>Comparative Advantage </em>model.
Hence, US should export AC's to UK and import TV sets from UK to gain from specialization and trade.
<em> In this way nations can gain from specialization and trade by making use of Comparative Advantage theory</em>.
It is to be noted that <em>Absolute Advantage model </em>of Adam Smith is also good as it highlights production of that good by a country, which it can produce in large quantities with fewer resources and minimal time than any other nation in the world. But the <em>Comparative Advantage Model </em>developed by David Ricardo considers opportunity cost and is much more refined than Absolute Advantage Model.
<em></em>
