The injection of the antibodies to the toxin will help the individual. Toxin means the poison that was present in the bite of the snake. So to counteract this poison an injection that contains the antibodies of that toxin will have to be provided to the individual immediately. If not as this was a bite of a poisonous snake it could prove to be fatal.
In countries like the USA, incidents of snake bites are very common. The effect of the snake bite depends on whether the snake was a venomous snake or a harmless snake. In this case, the snake was a poisonous snake and these are considered deadly and we are required to provide immediate medical help to such patients.
The injection of the antibodies is also called an anti-venom. The bite of the snake may result in symptoms like localized pain, convulsions, paralysis, and nausea. The faster the antivenom is provided the quicker the desired result would be got.
1. Learn more about poisonous snakes here:
brainly.com/question/11312599
2. Learn more about anti-venom here:
brainly.com/question/15198219
#SPJ4
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Structural adjustment programs are economic strategies which developing countries must abide with in order to be eligible for Loans from the world bank or other financial institutions. It has a lot of criticism and the option D in the question is one of those criticism.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Educated guess, its the one that differs from the other 3
Answer:
A). Was replaced by someone who is below the age of 40.
Explanation:
Prima Facie Case of discrimination(Title VII, Civil Rights Act, 1964) is elucidated as the case in which the petitioner possesses adequate evidence to validate his complaint or allegation and prove that he/she has been discriminated against by their employer. To make such a case, the plaintiff is required to present sufficient evidence to prove to the judge or convince him/her to deduce that the discrimination from the employer's end took place.
As per the question, to make a 'Prima facie case' against the employer Milford is required to not let disclosed or established that he 'was replaced by someone who is below the age of 40' as this would influence the credibility of his allegation and make the judge infer a decision against him(due to the age factor). Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:Boafil is most likely to face a negligent hiring case or consequence
Explanation:
When employers decide to hire a new employee it is always crucial that the background check is thoroughly done to avoid a case of negligent hiring.
Background check gives detailed information about the potential employee anything that the company may need to take into consideration before they hire them such as skills, weaknesses, strengths and anything that will play a role or be a threat in the job they take in the future. If this is not done it could cost a company and lead to some legal battles.
It could cost a company because the person may be unqualified for that job which means they won't even be able to perform the tasks given to them and they may even put the life of other employees in danger. They may hire someone who says he can drive but he really can't drive and end up hurting another employee and the company will face legal consequences of negligent hiring .
The employer has to enforce reasonable care or a duty of care which is called due diligence that ensures that an employer takes into consideration all the measures that are required in hiding a new employee to ensure that other employees will be safe and the new employee will not pose any risk to others. If the due diligence is not exercised that where the case of negligent hiring takes place.