All categories

3 years ago

The British theory of mercantilism, by which the colonies were governed, held that

Social Studies

1 answer:

Katena32 [7]3 years ago

4 0

1. Letter C is the correct answer.

2. Letter E is the correct answer.

Mercantilism was an economic system used by European powers from the 16th to the 18th centuries. This system was responsible for generating wealth to national powers while colonies were being strongly explored. According to the British theory of mercantilism, the colonies should be carefully controlled in order to support the metropole's needs. Thus, taxing colonial goods at a higher rate than the same goods produced in Britain was a mercantilist strategy found that served the home country's needs and harmed the colonial economy at the same time.

You might be interested in

The lack of jurisdiction of home country governments over supplier behavior is exemplified by:

Liono4ka [1.6K]

Answer: The lack of jurisdiction of home country governments over supplier behavior is exemplified by car-telling and black-market.

5 0

3 years ago

To determine whether the strength of people's self-esteem is related to their income levels, researchers would most likely make

Helen [10]

The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "correlational research." In order to determine whether the strength of people's self-esteem is related to their income levels, researchers would most likely make use of correlational research. Correlational research refers to quantitative method in which you have 2 or more quantitative variables from the same group of subjects.

4 0

2 years ago

Who passes or veto’s laws

iogann1982 [59]

.......???!!????????????????????

7 0

2 years ago

Differentiate between fair descrimination and unfair discrimination,and also use relevent examples

serg [7]

Answer:

Fair discrimination- Discrimination means treating some people differently from others. It isn't always unlawful - after all, people are paid different wages depending on their status and skills. However, there are certain reasons for which your employer can't discriminate against you by law. Discrimination happens when an employer treats one employee less favourably than others. It could mean a female employee being paid less than a male colleague for doing the same job, or an employee from a minority ethnic community being refused the training opportunities offered to other colleagues.

There are specific laws against some types of discrimination (called 'unlawful discrimination'). If your employer treats you less favourably for an unlawful reason, you may be able to take action. If your employer treats you unfairly for any other reason, this is not unlawful discrimination.

There are laws against discrimination on the basis of your:

-gender

-marriage or civil partnership

-gender reassignment

-pregnancy and maternity leave

-sexual orientation

-disability

-race

-colour

-ethnic background

-nationality

-religion or political opinion

-age

Unfair discrimination- Unfair discrimination is when you are treated differently as compared to other categories of people and that your dignity as a human being is impaired by such treatment.

Discrimination is regarded as unfair when it imposes burdens or withholds benefits or opportunities from any person on one of the prohibited grounds listed in the Act, namely: race, gender, sex, pregnancy, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth etc.

It is important to note that the Act does not prohibit discrimination but unfair discrimination.There are certain circumstances where discrimination can be regarded as fair e.g. measures designed to advance persons disadvantaged by the previous system of racial discrimination.

Cases for fair discrimination (read case)- The new amendments to the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (the EEA) assist employers in defending unfair discrimination claims by enabling employers to show that the alleged unfair discrimination is justifiable. Prior to the amendment, an employer was only able to escape liability by showing that the discrimination in question was fair.

Hope it helps!!!

3 0

3 years ago

describe the goals and content of the dsm, and discuss the potential dangers and benefits of using diagnostic labels.

Sloan [31]

Clinicians can utilise a systematic interviewing strategy described in the manual to arrive at a diagnosis for DSM. They respond to questions that are posed objectively about the person's perceptible behaviours on five different levels, or axes.

The classification has a satisfactory level of reliability. In collaboration with the International Classification of Diseases, DSM diagnoses are created (ICD). Diagnostic labels, according to DSM-IV detractors, can stigmatise a person by skewing how others interpret and perceive their past and present activities as well as how they are perceived by others. The advantages of diagnostic labels are that they facilitate communication between mental health practitioners regarding treatment and therapy and that they create a common language for thought-sharing among researchers looking into the causes and therapies of diseases.

Learn more about DSM here:

brainly.com/question/29440663

#SPJ4

6 0

1 year ago