No, Yin is not correct. If x = 19, the measure of angle ABC = 4(19) – 12 = 64. Therefore, the two base angles measure 64°. An equilateral triangle is equiangular, so each angle would have to measure 60° because there are 180° in a triangle.
If x = 19 m∠ABC = (4.19 – 12)°=64°, and <span>m∠ACB = (2.19 + 26)°=64° so the other angle can be found with </span>m∠ABC + m∠ACB + <span>m∠CAB =180° </span> m∠CAB =180°-m∠ABC -<span>m∠ACB =180°-128°=52° </span>so the triangle is not aquilateral, he was wrong