Answer:
$140
Explanation:
Calculation for What is the least amount the government can spend to overcome the $350 billion gap
First step is to find the Multiplier using this formula
Multiplier=1(1-Marginal propensity)
Let plug in the formula
Multiplier=1/(1-0.6)
Multiplier=1/0.4
Multiplier=2.5
Now let calculate the least amount the government can spend using this formula
Least amount=Gap/Multiplier
Let plug in the formula
Least amount=$350 billion /2.5
Least amount=$140
Therefore the least amount the government can spend to overcome the $350 billion gap is $140
Answer:
c. 10.38%
Explanation:
Loan Amount = $10,000
Quarterly Interest payment = $250
Interest Payment for the year = $250 x 4
Interest Payment for the year = $1,000
Nominal interest rate = ($1,000 / $10,000) x 100 = 10%
Nominal interest rate = r = 10%
Number of periods = m = 4
Effective Interest rate = [ ( 1 + r/m )^m]-1
Effective Interest rate = [ ( 1 + 0.1/4 )^4] -
Effective Interest rate = [ ( 1 + 0.025 )^4] -1
Effective Interest rate = 10.38%
Answer:
Appalachian Beverages
The Updated current ratio is:
= 1.65
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Current assets = $39,900
Current ratio = 1.90
Current liabilities = $21,000 ($39,900/1.90)
Current Assets:
Beginning balance = $39,900
Inventory $5,100
Cash ($2,000)
Ending balance = $43,000
Current Liabilities:
Beginning balance = $21,000
Accounts Payable $5,100
Ending balance = $26,100
Analysis of Transactions:
1. Inventory $5,100 Accounts Payable $5,100
2. Delivery Truck $10,000 Cash $2,000 Two-year Note Payable $8,000
Updated current ratio = Current assets/Current liabilities
= $43,000/$26,100
= 1.65
Answer:
$3,135 unfavorable
$9,937.50 unfavorable
Explanation:
The formula and the computation of the direct labor price and efficiency variance is shown below:
Direct labor price variance
= (Standard rate - Actual rate) × Actual hours of production
= ($15- $145,600 ÷ 9,500 hours ) × 9,500 labor hour worked
= ($15 - $15.33) × 9,500 labor hour worked
= $3,135 unfavorable
Labor efficiency variance is
= (Actual production - standard production) × standard rate per unit
= (6,600 units - 9,500 hours ÷ 1.6 hours) × $15
= (6,600 units - 5,937.0) × $15
= $9,937.50 unfavorable
Since the actual hours is more than the standard one so it would lead to unfavorable variance
Answer:
In this scenario, <u>LISA</u> has both an absolute advantage in food preparation, and <u>LISA</u> has a comparative advantage in food preparation.
Assume that initially, Sam and Lisa are splitting both tasks for a large number of events. Then they decide to start shifting some work according to the principle of comparative advantage. In particular, the person with the comparative advantage in food preparation will take over preparing food for one more event, and the other person will use the freed-up time to get more clients. As a result, the total number of events for which food is prepared will remain unchanged, but the number of new clients will increase by <u>1</u>.
Before they were getting 3 new customers since Sam got 2 and Lisa 1, but since Sam will only look for clients, then the total number of clients will be 4 (or 1 more).
Explanation:
It takes Sam 12 hours to prepare the food for an event and 3 hours of effort to get each new client.
- Sam's opportunity cost of preparing food = 12/3 = 4 new clients
- Sam's opportunity cost of getting new clients = 3/12 = 0.25 of food preparation
For Lisa, it takes 10 hours to prepare food for an event and 5 hours to get a new client.
- Lisa's opportunity cost of preparing food = 10/5 = 2 new clients
- Lisa's opportunity cost of getting new clients = 5/10 = 0.5 of food preparation
