Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.
The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.
The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.
Not sure but I'll take a chance: Probably product existance. If not then product capture
Answer:
3,300 deer
Explanation:
Total funds available to meet the entire cost of capturing stray deer = $48,000
This represents the total funds available as the Bruno & Court is a non profit organisation, it needs funding and as provided in the given case total funds available are $48,000 through local philanthropy.
Associated fixed cost in this activity = $15,000
Thus, maximum variable cost shall be = $48,000 - $15,000
= $33,000
Variable cost per deer = $10
Total number of deer to be captured = $33,000/$10 = 3,300 deer
