Answer:
The correct answer is C. greater perceived value.
Explanation:
Considering Nora's previous experience, it can be determined that her purchase decision is not oriented to the brand, but to the perception of value over other variables. In this scenario, it is most likely that Nora chooses to decide on the second option, since surely having no preferences she wants to experience the experience of enjoying new sneakers with different variables than the one she initially acquired.
Not guarantee that resources will be allocated efficiently nor that there will be equality.
It's a method where <span>subordinates share a significant degree of decision-making power with their immediate superiors
One positive benefit of the employee involvement and participation is that companies will prepare more employees to understand the company's operational method and make more potential leaders for the company if it choose to expand in the future</span>
Answer:
Yeah, her argument will be good in Aceves. The further explanation is given below.
Explanation:
The promissory clause applies to just the requirement that although no attorney seems to be legal, a commitment is actionable. This happens whenever the Promiser already made that commitment to something like the Promisee who performs mostly on commitment.
- Aceves having operated throughout the specific situation mostly on the foundation of the Bank's commitment or withdrew its complaint. Therefore in this circumstance, the essential requirement that perhaps the promisee would have focused mostly on promiser is accomplished.
- Consecration of promise to pay estoppels is founded on either the ideals of equity as well as justice. The lender's action was unreasonable to Aceves and because of that, the premise would be effective on either the bank as to when the applicant was working on a pledge basis. Thus Aceves will be accurate in her argument.
Answer:
$32.4 million
Explanation:
The computation of the balance in the deferred tax liability in the December 31, 2021, balance sheet is shown below:
Deferred tax liability is
= Tax depreciation exceeded depreciation for financial reporting purposes × enacted tax rate
= $108 million × 30%
= $32.4 million
Simply we multiplied the exceeded amount with the enacted rate so that the deferred tax liability could come
