Tinker v. Des Moines, and Hazelwood v. kuhlmeier is the Supreme Court is about freedom of speech case, and United States v. Nixon is the rule of law case so the only answer is In Re Gault
Answer:
during closing statements
Explanation:
In court, it is up to the lawyer to uphold a thesis. Be it defense, for the defendant's benefit, or prosecution in cases where the prosecutor uses an auxiliary lawyer to make the allegations. Among the many ways a lawyer can act in certain trials, some stand out. In the case of confessed defendants, that is, those who assume the crime, the lawyer's role is to uphold the thesis of a simple homicide or to disqualify the aggression. Somehow, the professional tries to soften the client's penalty. In situations where the defendant does not confess the crimes, lawyers use the thesis of refusal of authorship, where the accused do not assume the act.
Regardless, during the closing statements of a criminal trial, attorneys should provide the final summaries of their cases to help the jury or judge recall important points of the case.
I assumed you meant to put this under English.
Holden is watching from the hill. He doesn’t want to go into the stands because if he goes into the stands he has to face the students in whom are sitting there.
Answer:
It gave people the right to let follow the laws by the government.
