The statement that best describes the narrator in this excerpt is as follows:
- The narrator is not entirely truthful about his reasons for staying in Venice.
Thus, the correct option is B.
<h3>What is Narrator?</h3>
A narrator may be defined as an individual or personality who conveys a story, or a representative fashioned by an author to narrate a description.
The excerpt given below illustrates the situation of being enchanted with Venice and with a girl with a couple of black eyes that is recreating with his spirit. These are the absolute and authentic explanations for the narrator in Venice.
The complete question is as follows:
The romantic character of the place delighted me; I was very much amused by the air of adventure and intrigue that prevailed in this region of masks and gondolas; and I was exceedingly smitten by a pair of languishing black eyes, that played upon my heart from under an Italian mantle. So I persuaded myself that I was lingering in Venice to study men and manners. At least I persuaded my friends so, and that answered all my purpose.
What statement best describes the narrator in this excerpt?
Therefore, the correct option for this question is B, i.e. the narrator is not entirely truthful about his reasons for staying in Venice.
To learn more about Narrator, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/860877
#SPJ1
U have to mark us brainliest
The correct answer is D. Ad hominem
Explanation:
As other fallacies, Ad hominem fallacy implies a faulty reasoning or argument. in the case of Ad Hominem, this occurs because the speaker attacks his/her opponent traits, and does not provide any evidence to refute the opponent's argument.
This fallacy occurs in "Gracie is the worst class president ever. she doesn't even know how to dance" because the speaker does not explain why Gracie is not a good president, instead the speaker attacks Gracie by pointing out she does not know how to dance, which is not related to the Gracie being a bad president.
The first president of Brazil was <span>Fernando Henrique Cardoso who became the first president of Brazil in 1998.</span>
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "one should have reasons in place that demonstrate the premise is not sufficiently likely to be true." When disagreeing with a premise, <span>one should have reasons in place that demonstrate the premise is not sufficiently likely to be true.</span>
