It was all about "Taxation without representation "
They were first used as evidence in 1892.
<span>Population size is closely linked to its rate of change. If the population is below the threshold for the resources available, it will increase in size ... The more distance between the actual size and the threshold, the greater the rate of increase. If the population is above its threshold, it will start to decrease in size. The threshold will be the equilibrium position so it will tend to wave up and down until it gets to the equilibrium. The reason real life populations don't do this is because the resources are changing all the time so the equilibrium is a moving target.</span>
The choices for your question are:
a. It has been proven as a fact.
b. It has been changed over time.
c. It predicts but does not explain.
d. It has stayed the same for a long time.
The main reason why the scientific model of atoms is considered a theory rather than a law is because it predicts but does not explain. The answer to your question is C. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has helped you.
