Answer:
The correct answer is A. As a result of 20th century Supreme Court rulings, symbolic political speech gained substantial protections from government regulations.
Explanation:
Symbolic speech is a term that describes communicative situations in which the message transmitted is not literally expressed by the interlocutor. This type of speech is covered by the First Amendment implicitly.
Rulings such as Tinker v. Des Moines, United States v. O'Brien, Texas v. Johnson, and Cohen v. California expanded the protection of this type of discourse, including it within the protections of the First Amendment to freedom of expression.
For example, in the case Texas v. Johnson, it was established that the burning of an American flag involved a case of symbolic speech, so it should not be subject to prohibition by any type of law.
Australia lol we don’t love cows
"A" is quite correct, though "C" adds a bit more detail of how soldiers felt about Trench Warfare. In my honest opinion, I think "D" is the correct answer.
Trench Warfare was rather horrific, and brutal to say the least -- it was also "boring" during stalemates if neither party was engaging in any sort of push.
Note: I'm not a teacher of any sorts! This is just my opinion from things I've learned in the previous years.
Answer:
Washington recognizes that it is natural for people to organize and operate within groups such as political parties, but he also argues that every government has recognized political parties as an enemy and has sought to repress them because of their tendency to seek more power than other groups and to take revenge on ...
Explanation:
