Answer: the actual call price minus the intrinsic value of the call.
Explanation:
The actual price of a call is calculated as the sum of the intrinsic value of the call and the time value of the call option in the manner:
Price of call = Intrinsic value of call + Time value of call
The Time value of the call is therefore:
Change subject of below formula:
Price of call = Intrinsic value of call + Time value of call
Time value of call = Price of call - Intrinsic value of call
Assuming Raleigh BBQ has $48,000 in current assets and $39,000 in current liabilities. This refers to as working capital management.
<h3>What is Working Capital Management?</h3>
Working capital management can be defined as the way in which a company or an organization ensures that both their current asset and current liabilities are put in use effectively and efficiently.
A company who make use of working capital management as a strategy will tend to ensure that their liabilities does not exceed their assets so as to maintain the company financial health.
Therefore this refers to as working capital management.
Learn more about working capital management here:brainly.com/question/14736085
Answer:
Answer is solved and explained in the explanation section below.
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to prepare a trial balance assuming that all accounts have normal balances. And the purpose of making a trial balance is to make sure that the entries in the system are mathematically sound.
So,
Badger Auto Parts Debit Credit
Accounts payable $8,500
Accounts receivable $40,800
Accumulated depreciation (furniture) $47,300
Advertising expense $29,200
Cash $3,200
Common stock $100,000
Cost of goods sold $184,300
Depreciation expense (furniture) $10,400
Furniture $128,000
Income tax expense $3,800
Income tax payable $3,600
Interest expense $6,650
Interest payable $1,800
Inventory $60,500
Notes payable $50,000
Prepaid rent $15,250
Retained earnings $15,900
Sales revenue $264,700
Utilities expense $9,700
Totals $491,800 $491,800
It is that your pay stubs might b wrong
