Answer:
because the supplier is already supplying sellers with what the entrepreneur is supposed to be selling and if more people are going to the other suppliers than no one will buy it from the entrepreneur because they can get it from suppliers
Explanation:
sorry if its wrong!
Answer:
No, it is not a valid argument for import protection
Explanation:
There are several arguments that are waged in favor of protectionism. One of the most common, that is seen in this question, in the unfair competition argument, in which domestic producers argue that producers from abroad pay unfair wages, or engage in dumping, or do not pay enough for raw materials.
The fact is, what is a substandard wage in the United States, is probably an average, or even higher-than-average wage in Indonesia, because wages are determined by the market conditions in each country. Indonesia, as a low-income country, has wages on average well below the average wage in the United States, a high-income country.
Therefore, domestic producers do not have any valid reason to demand import protection because Indonesian producers pay substantially lower wages than them. These are economic realities given by market conditions.
Answer:
$2,830,000
Explanation:
Net working capital is calculating by subtracting current liabilities from current assets
- current assets = cash and marketable securities + accounts receivable + inventories = $560,000 + $2,000,000 + $2,500,000 = $5,060,000
- current liabilities = accrued wages and taxes + accounts payable + notes payable = $610,000 + $910,000 + $710,000 = $2,230,000
net working capital = $5,060,000 - $2,230,000 = $2,830,000
Are there answer options?
if you tell me I might be able to answer your question :D
<span>-B People should evaluate different forms of savings vehicles based on their needs.
</span>
