1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
viva [34]
3 years ago
12

To act rationally, according to Kant, means that one is capable of moving himself or herself to act by strong preferences, that

is, to limit oneself to desires which would be compelling desires for any person in the same circumstances T or F
History
1 answer:
bekas [8.4K]3 years ago
7 0
The answer is true. Rationalism, otherwise called the pragmatist development, is a philosophical regulation that affirms that reality can best be found by reason and true investigation, instead of confidence, authoritative opinion or religious instructing. 
Kant's hypothesis is a case of a deontological moral theory– as indicated by these speculations, the rightness or unsoundness of activities does not rely upon their outcomes but rather on whether they satisfy our obligation. Kant trusted that there was a preeminent standard of profound quality, and he alluded to it as The Categorical Imperative.
You might be interested in
HELP PLEASE!!!
zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer:

-by setting up government bureaucracies

-through uniform laws and justice systems

-by reducing taxation

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What role do trade organizations play in trade?
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

Pretty much they just settle disputes that might come about.

Explanation:

Trade organizations are forums of governments to negotiate trade agreements. And if a dispute of some sort appears, the trade organizations are able to settle it by having the papers ect. Hope I helped! Have a great day! :)

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
QUICK ASAP PLZZZ
Semenov [28]

Answer:

The United States should not take sides in foreign wars.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the casualties of Lexington and Concord?
nika2105 [10]
For the colonists side in the Battle of Lexington and Concord, <span>49 were killed, 39 were wounded, and 5 were missing.

For the British side, </span><span>73 were killed, 174 were wounded, and 26 were missing.

Totalled from both sides, there were 122 killed, 213 wounded, and 31 missing.

Hope this helps!</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Are the east longitude lines left of the prime meridian? Please Help
madam [21]

East is to the right.

West is to the left.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the Magna Carta inspire later documents ?
    12·1 answer
  • Why was japan so successful in expanding its territory in 1942
    6·2 answers
  • Why was the Petition of Right 1628 of such of such importance
    15·1 answer
  • By Virginia law, what was the child of a slave woman and a free man considered?
    14·2 answers
  • What is the british response to the boston tea party?
    8·1 answer
  • Bobby borrowed $500 at 12 percent simple annual interest. He paid back $680 to pay off the loan. How many years did it take
    12·2 answers
  • What can Congress do if the President vetoes a law?
    11·1 answer
  • What was the Battle of Midway?
    9·2 answers
  • Why casework is such an important aspect of being an effective legislator?​?​
    14·1 answer
  • What crucial mistake did British General Cornwallis make that led to the defeat of the British army?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!