Answer:
<u>compliance-based ethics.</u>
Explanation:
Compliance-based ethics can be defined as a set of rules and conduct for the actions of employees of a particular company to be based on compliance with the laws that regulate business. It is designed to prevent, detect and punish behavior that is not in accordance with a company's pre-established rules.
There are critics who believe that compliance-based ethical codes do not promote individual ethical ability, but rather enforce rules motivated by fear and punishment, as legality and ethics are complementary but not equal.
I believe the answer is A: Current ratio. It’s the only one that makes sense.
Answer:
$1 = 122.84 Hungarian Forint
Explanation:
<em>The purchasing power parity theory states the future spot rate and and he current spot exchange rate between two currencies can be linked to the relative inflation rate between the two currencies. This also known as the law of one price.
</em>
The model is given as follows:
S = So× (1+Fc)/(1+Fh)
Fc - inflation rate in Hungary - 6.9%
Fh- Inflation rate in the US- 2.8%
S- Future spot rate- ?
So- Current spot rate-188.13
Expected exchange rate one year from now
118.13× (1.069)/(1.028)
=122.8414
= 122.84 Hungarian Forint
$1 = 122.84 Hungarian Forint
Answer:
The correct answer is: A) True.
Explanation:
Strategic commercial policy is defined as that commercial policy that a government implements through intervention and regulation and that is intended to modify the strategic interaction that occurs in certain sectors between national and foreign companies in the international arena. These actions, which are usually implemented through industrial policy, try
favor national companies over their foreign rivals. Those who support these practices argue that, given the imperfections of the markets, there are good reasons that justify an active industrial policy.
The strategic trade policy argument consists of two explanations: first, it states that with appropriate actions; A government increases national income if it somehow ensures that the companies that appropriate the advantages of acting first are national and not foreign.
Secondly; it is convenient for a government to intervene in an industry if it helps national companies to overcome the entry barriers created by foreign companies; who have already reaped the advantages of the one who acts first.
In conclusion, if these arguments are correct, the government has many reasons to intervene in international trade.