You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
117.93 is greater than 117.859 by .035.
Answer: approximately 35
explanation:
divide 106 by 3 = 35.33
By definition, we have to:
In plane geometry, a rectangle is a parallelogram whose four sides are at right angles to each other. Opposite sides have the same length.
There is a proof that a quadrilateral is a rectangle:
1) Its parallel sides are the same.
2) Its two diagonals are the same, and they bisect each other at the common midpoint
3) Any rectangle can be inscribed in a circle, two of whose diameters coincide with the diagonals of the rectangle.
4) If all the angles of a quadrilateral are right angles, then it is a rectangle
