Answer:
the marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost
Explanation:
In response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the government decided to allocate more resources toward defense goods. The government's decision reflects their assessment that t<u>he marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost.</u>
In utility in economics, once the marginal benefits of buying an item outweighs the marginal cost of the item, you buy it. After the September 11, 2001 attack, the United States government found a need to increase the defense budget to prevent further attack. It can be concluded that the marginal benefit derived from increased defense spending outweighs the cost.
Answer:C
indecision
According to the passage, in Shakespeare’s tragedies, “A tragic flaw is a defect in a character that leads to his or her demise and, often, death at the end of the play. In Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet, the main character Hamlet’s indecision over whether to avenge his father’s death leads to his downfall.” This shows that Hamlet’s tragic flaw is his indecision.
Explanation:
When a person is practising active listening, then he should be focusing more on:
- Understanding what the person is saying
- Asking questions
<h3>Active listening</h3>
This refers to the skill which involves listening to a person, understanding what is being said, asking questions or giving responses based on the information given.
As a result of this, when a coach listens to a person who tells him about their problem and he is practising active listening, then he would be more empathetic and the speaker would feel valued and understood.
Read more about active listening here:
brainly.com/question/10879412
Technology is basically a body of knowledge used to create tools, develop skills, and extract or collect materials. Now of course there are many pros and cons of technology. One pro is that it’s gets stuff done faster a con is that some people loose their jobs because a machine can do it so why does a person need to do it.
Cosmides and Tooby tested participants' ability to solve variations of the Wason problem, including ones containing stories about a particular culture. Their results showed that <u>culture-specific knowledge</u> is not always necessary for conditional reasoning.
<u>Explanation:</u>
These tests conducted by Cosmides and Tooby contained the participant using their abilities and logical reasoning in order to solve various variations of the Wason Problem. While the problems had a cultural addition to them, where they may or may not contain stories about a particular culture.
This led to similar results though which showed Cosmides and Tooby that it was not necessary for the participants to have knowledge of the culture specifically to remember or know the stories. Thus, the more general approach and inductive processes were not culture specific and thus, needed no cultural knowledge as the process were distributed similarly throughout the cultures.
