All categories

4 years ago

According to Polybius, how democratic was the Roman Republic?

2 answers:

8 0

T<span>he American founders regarded the Romans as the one who developed the democracy, the Roman Republic. The romans are constitutionally democratic but in practice they are undemocratic society because the government is dominated by selected caste of wealthy aristocrats. He provided </span>a criteria<span> in assessing the democracy of Roman Republic.</span>

Oduvanchick [21]4 years ago

5 0

The Roman Republic was never proposed to be a democracy. Rather, as recognized by Polybius, it was an analysis that tried to meld majority rule government, privileged and government into the ideal socio-political framework.

Further Explanation:

Democratic was the Roman Republic:

When free, the Romans set up a republic, a legislature where residents chose agents for standard for their benefit. A republic is very not quite the same as a majority rule government, in which each resident is required to assume a functioning job in administering the state.

Roman republic:

The Roman Republic was the time of old style Roman human advancement starting with the oust of the Roman Kingdom, customarily dated to 509 BC, and finishing in 27 BC with the foundation of the Roman Empire.

Importance of the Roman Republic:

The Roman Empire was one of the best articulations of Democracy in antiquated occasions. The Romans rehearsed a type of Democracy (SPQR represents the Senate and People of Rome) on a wide scale reason just because. Each class in Roman culture felt spoke to (aside from slaves).

Who is Polybius When did he compose this:

Polybius was a Greek student of history of the Hellenistic time frame noted for his work The Histories, which secured the time of 264–146 BC in detail.

Subject: History

Level: High School

Keywords: Democratic was the Roman Republic, Roman republic, Importance of the Roman Republic, Who is Polybius When did he compose this.

Learn more about evolution on:

brainly.com/question/5248907

brainly.com/question/7223744

You might be interested in

Why might France have been more motivated to resist independence movement in Algeria then it had in French Indo-china?

Nataly_w [17]

Because <span>Algeria had a large settler community made up of French-speaking Europeans.</span>

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

When massachusetts refused to renounce the letter written by samuel adams and james otis in 1768, great britain responded by?

kap26 [50]

The letter signed by Samuel Adams caused very negative reactions in the British, which increased tensions between the British Parliament and Massachusetts, who not to give up what the letter said, led the British Empire to decide the occupation of the city of Boston by the British Army. This fact, in turn, and given the repressive forms of reaction of the British, was a fact that rushed and provoked the American Revolution. It should be noted that in the letter, it was expressed at the end that the settlers were still subjects of His Majesty and that only expressed with anguish their problems.

8 0

3 years ago

Please help and explain why it is the answer

uranmaximum [27]

Answer:

A. Atlanta newspapers publish false report of black violence against white women.

Explanation:

Critically looking at the facts presented in the order charts, it can be deduced that certain factors (elements) were commonly used to describe the scenario. These includes people of different race (African-American and White) and riot.

Also, since the riot broke out in Atlanta, the source of information which caused the riot is most likely to have been from Atlanta. Therefore, the false report published by the news agency (Atlanta newspapers) triggered the riot.

Hence, the order of events in a chronological order is;

I. Atlanta newspapers publish false report of black violence against white women.

II. 48-hour riot breaks out in Atlanta, September 1906.

III. African-American and White Businessmen come together to restore order and stop the riot.

IV. Deeper segregation results.

5 0

3 years ago

Question 2 Multiple Choice Worth 4 points) What is the United States government equivalent of the Consuls in Rome? Legislative b

tia_tia [17]

What is the United States government equivalent of the Consuls in Rome is the Executive branch.

<h3>What is consul?</h3>

Consul is a form of government in Roman republic, it is the highest authority and political office.

They consul is usually managed by two individual who are the head and highest authority.

Therefore, What is the United States government equivalent of the Consuls in Rome is the executive branch.

Learn more on consul here,

brainly.com/question/13614174

7 0

2 years ago

Where were the first experiments in building empires conducted?

uysha [10]

Answer:

the middle east.

Explanation:

The Middle East is the region that is considered as the birth of civilization. It is also the region that gave birth to the first empires. The first civilization sin this region, such as the people from Mesopotamia, Egyptians, Hittites, Assyrians, all have formed their own countries. Because of their advancements and constant need for more resources, they started to perform military campaigns through which they wee conquering new territories. Those were actually the first attempts of building an empire, at least from what is known so far from the history.

3 0

3 years ago