Other assumptions associated with this question are as follows:
- One person can feed on 1 hen/day for a year
- 1 hen must east 25 grasshoppers /day
- the total mass of 1000 grasshoppers is 1kg
- 600 grasshoppers are needed to feed 1 human per day
Grasshoppers is represented as Gh.
The total amount needed to feed the hen per year is:
- If expressed in Kg, then it would be 9,125/1000 which is
- = 9.125Kg/annum.
So if the farmer chose to live on grasshoppers rather than on hens, the calculation is given as follows:
- (90 kg/1 hour) x (24 hours/1 day) x (1 person/ 600 Gh)
The amount of Grasshoppers required is given as follows;
If the farmer can gather 90 Gh in one hour then,
- The total amount of Gh per day is 90 x 24 = 2,160
- the total amount of Gh available in a year is 2160 x 365 = 788,400 Gh/Year
- If 600 grasshoppers are quired to feed the human per day, then we work backward
- The total amount of Gh available in a day is 788,400/365. This is equal to 2160 Gh
- The total amount of people this can feed is given as 2,160/600
- Which is equal to 3.6 persons.
Since humans or people cannot be divided into fractions like a measure of sugar or a measure of liquid, the answer is best left to the most approximate digit with it 4 Persons.
Learn more about Trophic Levels and food availability here:
brainly.com/question/2001301
False, quantitative data uses numbers
Answer:
i have a big explanation that i cant write it here so you should look for someone else if you need a compact one cuz this is brief but it worth it to get points :)
Explanation:
It's basically because people have different ideas and wishes on what to be,they have different opinions on which is better and which isn't the best. Teaching may be people's tea but doctors,engineers,football players,basketball players,why?,even carpenters are people's tea.its not just teaching which is a profession.there are many professions even fashion designers can be some peoples dream and even police officers can be some people's dream it could be anything!
According to science, yes – happiness, indeed, has a heritable component. It’s a finding that is surprising and not surprising at the same time. It's surprising because of our culturally-sanctioned convictions that with our choices, thoughts, and behavior, we have the final say on how well we function in our lives, not our circumstances. But it's also not surprising because if our genes play a part in shaping who we are in the world, they will also have a say in how we pursue and find happiness. People might inherit genes that put them in advantageous or less favorable positions. Depression is genetic...
Answer:
I believe the answer is "The city is covered in snow"
Explanation:
the others aren't current conditions and pretty irrelevant
