Answer:
1 Dr Asko Parpola and Iravatham Mahadevan agreed it was syllabic writing system,but tried to read as pictograph.That is why they failed in their attempts.
2.Most of the scholars believed that the direction of writing was from Right to Left No language on earth was written from right to left during the IVC period ,Doble Hofer in his Voices in Stone has clearly stated that North Semitic people started writing from right to left during 1400 BCE while east and west Semitic people continued to write from left to right , Dravidians were right handists ,hence they could write only from left to right. Therefore R-L dogma is utterly a false one.
Answer:
Affidavit (assuming the exercise has the same question twice).
Explanation:
As the exercise suggests, an affidavit is a sworn statement, made under oath, before the appropiate magistrate or officer. In other words, is a some kind of authorization for certain processes. In this case, the prosecuting attorney is asking for an affidavit in order to support the search warrant.
The Department of State is the body of the federal government that implements national security policies.
<h3>What is the national security policy?</h3>
The policies includes the a guidelines for a country to address security needs of the people and the country at large.
Hence, the Department of State is responsible for implementation of the national security policies.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about national security policy
<em>brainly.com/question/25397499</em>
The correct answer is: "Unexpected, related or possible related to the research, suggests the research puts subjects or others at greater risk"
The OHRP defines an unticipated problem in the scenario of a research involving human participants. Defining the problem as unanticipated means that it was not foreseen at all when detailing the possible risks for the parcipants of the study on when those were asked to sign a consent form. It is also unanticipated in the sense that the problem which have aroused does not match in terms of likelihood with the characteristics of the specific individual suffering it.
Such term does not refer to some inconvenience with minimum consequences, but it suggest that the problem occurring affects the research subjects or others and places them at a greater risk of harm - physical, psychological, economic ,etc.- than was anticipated before the research.
