Answer:
Strong positive
Explanation:
In studies, we usually establish relationships between two or more variables using correlations. Correlations tell us how this variables are related.
- Two variables have a positive correlation when if one increases the other increases too.
- Two variables have a negative correlation when if one increases the other decreases and vice versa.
Also, a correlation can be weak, moderate or strong. Researchers agree that a correlation that is larger than 0.70 should be considered a strong correlation.
In this example Isabella reads about a study saying there's a correlation coefficient of +0.85 between hours spent studying and final exam grade. <u>The fact that the sign of this correlation is "+" tells us that it is positive</u> (the more hours spent studying, the better final exam grade). We can also see that <u>the coefficient is 0.85 which is greater than 0.70 and therefore we can consider this correlation as a strong one.</u>
Thus, Isabella would conclude that this is a strong positive relationship.
Answer:
I am gonna say the answer is D!!
Explanation:
I say D is the correct answer!!
Answer:
Yes, symbolic interactionism makes sense because we create fluid, changing meanings for symbols and objects given what we experience every day.
Explanation:
Symbolic interactionism is a framework for understanding how society is maintained in the relationship between individuals. Through interactions like conversation, cohabitating, and working together, people recreate meanings that they share. This amounts to shared understanding and interpretations that help to flesh out the social context we each live in. Thus, our natural and symbolic environments are made sense of through interaction and behavior that give meaning to objects and concepts. Putting your thumb up to mean yes is an example of symbolic interactionism that has come to mean more in this day and age because of the likes on social media.
The answer is "crosscutting cleavages
".
A cross-cutting cleavage happens when individuals that are on a similar cleavage, or division in the public arena (as per race, sexual orientation, ethnicity, geographic foundation, religion, and so on.), happen in various gatherings. A case of cross-cutting cleavage is that individuals from a similar ethnic gathering, (for example, Mexican-Americans) live in both the Northeast and the West in the United States.
Political researchers trust cross-slicing cleavages are a strategy to decrease strife in the public eye, as individuals from one gathering must join along various lines. At the end of the day, cross-cutting cleavages can enable individuals from various gatherings to cooperate to discover shared belief.
