Answer:
<em>=> Danielle pay $573.3 in property tax</em>
Explanation:
To calculate the property tax of the house, we take the property tax rate multiply by the assessed value of the property.
=> <em>Property tax = Assessed Value x Property Tax Rate</em>
The assessed value estimate the market value for the property, however even when there is large gap between these two, the assessed value is still used to calculate property tax because it is its purpose.
So that Danielle pay in property tax:
<em>Property tax = 16,380 x 3.5 = 57,330 cent = $573.3 </em>
<em>=> Danielle pay $573.3 in property tax</em>
<em />
Answer and Explanation:
The journal entries are given below:
On May 4
Account payable $610
To cash $610
(To record the cash paid)
On May 7
Account receivable $6,840
To service revenue $6,840
(To record the service on account)
On May 8
Supplies $870
To Account payable $870
(To record supplies purchased on account)
On May 9
Equipment $1,930
To cash $1,930
(To record the equipment purchase)
On May 17
Salary expense $700
To cash $700
(To record the salaries expense)
On May 22
Repair expense $800
To Account payable $800
(To record the received bill for repairing of an equipment)
On May 29
Prepaid rent $1,280
To cash $1,280
(To record the cash paid)
<span>The point of the long-run aggregate supply curve.
I hope this helps!
</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
I will give a basic hint to understanding this problem
Prevailing technique or what is best known as "Dominant Strategy" is an activity profile that is best for a specific player review of what different players are picking. for this situation there is no prevailing procedure for any player on the grounds that there is no single activity profile that expands the result for any player.
So we can say from this observations that the following is valid;
- A doesn't have a dominant strategy
- B doesn't have a dominant strategy
There are two Nash equilibria for this situation. Both the organizations are charging a low cost and both the organizations are charging a significant expense.
As such they can augment their benefit given what the adversary is doing.
I hope this explains the observation seen.
cheers I hope this helps
Answer:
The correct answer are: peripheral route; you do not have strong arguments for why your product is superior
Explanation:
The peripheral route, instead of examining the relevant arguments for the matter, individuals examine the message quickly or focus on simple indicators that help them decide whether to accept or reject the position advocated in the message. The elements that are peripheral to the arguments of the message are those that take center stage. These may include the communicator's physical attractiveness, the direct style of speaking, or the pleasant association between the message and the music that is heard in the background. Sometimes, the strength of the arguments is of secondary or almost null importance. Sometimes we lack the motivation, ability or time to reflect carefully. If we are disinterested, distracted or busy, we may not take the time to analyze the content of the message. Instead of analyzing whether the arguments are convincing, we will most likely follow the peripheral route, focusing on clues and indicators that activate automatic acceptance without too much cognitive processing. Peripheral processing allows communicators to design simple claims and messages to influence individuals. Although on many occasions this route may seem like the panacea of contemporary persuasion, the truth is that a good part of it is also carried out through mechanisms that involve careful and reflective considerations of the message's arguments, since, as we have indicated, When people have some motivation or are able to process messages, they are not based exclusively on peripheral cues and signals, or necessarily fall into the tricks of the persuader. When processing peripherally, people always rely on simple rules, to make decisions, "heuristic." For example the "heuristic" that experts should be believed and only for this reason accept the recommendation of a speaker, the heuristic "if many people think that something is good, then it should be" or those of reputation, consistency and security apparent in the argument. Peripheral and superficial processing does not produce profound and lasting changes of opinion. The effects of surface processing are ephemeral but relevant enough to convince an undecided voter or push a consumer towards the purchase of one or another product.
