Answer:
La respuesta es la D.
Explanation:
Decimos que la respuesta es la D, es decir la palabra llama,porque esta palabra sin cambiar en ninguna de sus sílabas ,tiene varios significados.Por ejemplo la palabra llama puede significar fuego,también la palabra llama tambien se puede referir a un animal mamífero que habita en algunas países que hacen parte de la región andina como colombia,argentina,ecuador.
Answer:
The correct option is: A) generalization
Explanation:
Generalization is described as the idea or thought that is obtained by abstracting certain common properties from specific instances or events.
It involves the transfer of information or knowledge across various instances.
In this process, an individual uses previous situations to learn and respond to a similar present situation.
Therefore, generalization can be described as the tendency of an individual to respond in a similar fashion to a different but similar situation or event.
<u>Therefore, this situation is an example of </u><u>generalization</u><u>.</u>
Answer:
Explanation:
There will be less conflict within the group and less pressure in terms of the group's demands and needs.
Answer:
B. It is a common form of economic thinking
Explanation:
Thinking at the margin is a pattern of thinking where the thinker thinks forward with regard to the coming hour, the coming day, or coming income, while letting the past to go and considering what is presently best for the the thinker or in the coming times.
Thinking at the margin involves thinking ahead, and in economics principle, thinking at the margin is required for making rational decisions
An example of thinking at the margin is deciding to by more pasta for the month than required when there is a scarcity of a brand of pasta and the inflation, which may both be due to the introduction of better brand of pasta by the manufacturer causing a delay, and a temporary inflation respectively
Therefore, thinking at the margin is a common form of economic thinking
In simple definition followership means:
1. the ability or willingness to follow a leader.
2. a group of followers or supporters; following.
Followership is the actions of someone in a subordinate role. It can also be considered as a specific set of skills that complement leadership, a role within a hierarchical organization, a social construct that is integral to the leadership process, or the behaviors engaged in while interacting with leaders in an effort to meet organizational objectives.[1] As such, followership is best defined as an intentional practice on the part of the subordinate to enhance the synergetic interchange between the follower and the leader.
In organizations, “leadership is not just done by the leader, and followership is not just done by followers.” [2] This perspective suggests that leadership and followership do not operate on one continuum, with one decreasing while the other increases. Rather, each dimension exists as a discrete dimension, albeit with some shared competencies.[3]
The study of followership is an emerging area within the leadership field that helps explain outcomes. Specifically, followers play important individual, relational, and collective roles in organizational failures and successes.[4][5][6] “If leaders are to be credited with setting the vision for the department or organization and inspiring followers to action, then followers need to be credited with the work that is required to make the vision a reality.”[7]
The term follower can be used as a personality type, as a position in a hierarchy, as a role, or as a set of traits and behaviors. Studies of followership have produced various theories including trait, behavioral attributes, role, and constructionist theories in addition to exploring myths or misunderstandings about followership.
