At the level of 0.05% significance we can not reject the psychologist's claim. His claim is supported.
Explanation:
When a researcher undertakes a project to do research firstly he takes some random samples. Sample is definite a small group of numbers assume to represent the whole population. Suppose a researcher wants to do research on married couples to find the trend of divorce among them. For that reason he will randomly choose some of the couples and will draw conclusions that inter personal communication reduce the chances of divorce.
Now to establish this experiment as a fact he needs to go through a test of level of significance. Where he will get the result that his statement is established or rejected.
HI there
The correct answer is : B
I hope that's help:) Please rate
In the following circumstances, it indicates that she is
psychologically dependent on the drug that she has been consumed regularly.
Psychological dependence arises in an individual when the person is dependent
on a particular thing and it involves an emotional motivation, having to stop
with a particular thing that he or she is already dependent on or used to would
likely cause a person to feel uneasy or to feel dissatisfied, and because of
it, the person would likely go on with the particular thing and continue to
engage in such behavior for the person feels that the particular thing is
needed and without it, he or she will feel uneasy. It is related in the given
scenario above as the person does not seem to stop and takes it regularly the
same dosage as she begun because she already exhibits psychological dependence.
The general consensus is that the Battle of Palmito Ranch was fought over a stockpile of cotton, which was bound to fetch a pretty penny at market.
The defeated Confederates decided to go for gold before having to surrender and end their racist war.
